Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24557420›Full record

SynthesisCritical care medicine2014

Randomized ICU trials do not demonstrate an association between interventions that reduce delirium duration and short-term mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nada S Al-Qadheeb, Ethan M Balk, Gilles L Fraser, Yoanna Skrobik, Richard R Riker, John P Kress, Shawn Whitehead, John W Devlin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interventions for preventing intensive care unit delirium in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Antipsychotics for treatment of delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Losing Sleep Over Delirium.Critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nada S Al-Qadheeb1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 2Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. 3Departments of Pharmacy and Critical Care Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 4Department of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 5Department of Critical Care Medicine and Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 6Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Ethan M Balk
Gilles L Fraser
Yoanna Skrobik
Richard R Riker
John P Kress
Shawn Whitehead
John W Devlin

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translation Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000073 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2012 to 2013
$5.5M
Preventing ICU Subsyndromal Delirium Conversion to Delirium with HaloperidolR15AG034915 · NIA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DEVLIN, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$322k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000073NIA NIH HHS R15 AG034915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe reviewed randomized trials of adult ICU patients of interventions hypothesized to reduce delirium burden to determine whether interventions that are more effective at reducing delirium duration are associated with a reduction in short-term mortality. DATA SOURCES: We searched CINHAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane databases from 2001 to 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Citations were screened for randomized trials that enrolled critically ill adults, evaluated delirium at least daily, compared a drug or nondrug intervention hypothesized to reduce delirium burden with standard care (or control), and reported delirium duration and/or short-term mortality (≤ 45 d). DATA EXTRACTION: In duplicate, we abstracted trial characteristics and results and evaluated quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We performed random effects model meta-analyses and meta-regressions. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 17 trials enrolling 2,849 patients which evaluated a pharmacologic intervention (n = 13) (dexmedetomidine [n = 6], an antipsychotic [n = 4], rivastigmine [n = 2], and clonidine [n = 1]), a multimodal intervention (n = 2) (spontaneous awakening [n = 2]), or a nonpharmacologic intervention (n = 2) (early mobilization [n = 1] and increased perfusion [n = 1]). Overall, average delirium duration was lower in the intervention groups (difference = -0.64 d; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.13; p = 0.01) being reduced by more than or equal to 3 days in three studies, 0.1 to less than 3 days in six studies, 0 day in seven studies, and less than 0 day in one study. Across interventions, for 13 studies where short-term mortality was reported, short-term mortality was not reduced (risk ratio = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; p = 0.19). Across 13 studies that reported mortality, meta-regression revealed that delirium duration was not associated with reduced short-term mortality (p = 0.11).

conclusionsA review of current evidence fails to support that ICU interventions that reduce delirium duration reduce short-term mortality. Larger controlled studies are needed to establish this relationship.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care UnitsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24557420
PMCPMC4799649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.