Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2014
The natural history of cystocele recurrence.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Subtotal vaginal hysterectomy with cervical ring preservation and cervical stump suspension to the sacrospinous ligament in women with pelvic organ prolapse: An exposed cohort study].Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2024Article
- The effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function.International urogynecology journal · 2023Observational
- The impact of levator ani muscle trauma and contraction on recurrence after prolapse surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Timing of recurrence after surgery in pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Anterior repair versus no anterior repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for anterior colporrhaphy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in South Korea.BMJ open · 2020Article
- A long-term comparative study of Uphold™ transvaginal mesh kit against anterior colporrhaphy.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Long-term subjective, clinical and sonographic outcomes after native-tissue and mesh-augmented posterior colporrhaphy.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Significant Improvement in Quality of Life, Positive Effect on Sexuality, Lasting Reconstructive Result and Low Rate of Complications Following Cystocele Correction Using a Lightweight, Large-Pore, Titanised Polypropylene Mesh: Final Results of a National, Multicentre Observational Study.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2019Article
- Observational
- Pelvic floor muscle weakness: a risk factor for anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence.International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
- Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.International urogynecology journal · 2015Review
- Fascial fixation versus non-fixation in vNOTES lateral suspension after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisFemale pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition, and recurrence after surgery is considered a significant clinical issue, especially in the anterior compartment. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no published data in the literature on the timing of recurrence. We used data obtained in clinical audit projects and a prospective surgical trial to define the natural history of cystocele recurrence.
methodsThis is an observational retrospective study utilising data of 166 patients seen at least twice after anterior colporrhaphy, obtained from four clinical audit projects and one prospective surgical trial.
resultsWe identified a total of 481 postoperative visits at a mean follow-up of 1.11 years in 166 individuals. At last available follow-up, 80 (48%) had evidence of cystocele recurrence (ICS POP-Q stage 2+), and 44 (27%) reported symptoms of prolapse. Ultrasound evidence of cystocele recurrence was seen in 74 women (45%). Regression modelling demonstrated that the likelihood of recurrence was highest between 1 and 2 years' follow-up.
conclusionsCystocele recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy seems to be a relatively early phenomenon, with maximum prevalence reached at 18-24 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24556972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.