Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24556798›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2014

Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Lei Zhang, Hong Yuan, Laurel M Burk, Christy R Inscoe, Michael J Hadsell, Pavel Chtcheprov, Yueh Z Lee, Jianping Lu, Sha Chang, Otto Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Radiation, inflammation and the immune response in cancer.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  6. Neurocognitive sparing of desktop microbeam irradiation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei ZhangDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Hong Yuan
Laurel M Burk
Christy R Inscoe
Michael J Hadsell
Pavel Chtcheprov
Yueh Z Lee
Jianping Lu
Sha Chang
Otto Zhou
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DESIMONE, JOSEPH M. · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Nanotechnology enabled desktop image-guided microbeam radiation therapy systemRC2CA148487 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHANG, SHA X, ZHOU, OTTO Z · 2009 to 2010
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148487NCI NIH HHS RC2-CA148487NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652NCI NIH HHS U54-CA151652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a promising experimental and preclinical radiotherapy method for cancer treatment. Synchrotron based MRT experiments have shown that spatially fractionated microbeam radiation has the unique capability of preferentially eradicating tumour cells while sparing normal tissue in brain tumour bearing animal models. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of generating orthovoltage microbeam radiation with an adjustable microbeam width using a carbon nanotube based x-ray source array. Here we report the preliminary results from our efforts in developing an image guidance procedure for the targeted delivery of the narrow microbeams to the small tumour region in the mouse brain. Magnetic resonance imaging was used for tumour identification, and on-board x-ray radiography was used for imaging of landmarks without contrast agents. The two images were aligned using 2D rigid body image registration to determine the relative position of the tumour with respect to a landmark. The targeting accuracy and consistency were evaluated by first irradiating a group of mice inoculated with U87 human glioma brain tumours using the present protocol and then determining the locations of the microbeam radiation tracks using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. The histology results showed that among 14 mice irradiated, 11 received the prescribed number of microbeams on the targeted tumour, with an average localization accuracy of 454 µm measured directly from the histology (537 µm if measured from the registered histological images). Two mice received one of the three prescribed microbeams on the tumour site. One mouse was excluded from the analysis due to tissue staining errors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisGliomaHumansMiceNanotubes, CarbonRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeNanotubes, Carbon

Identifiers

PMID24556798
PMCPMC4028041
OpenAlexW1976255317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.