ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2014
Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical note: Multi-MATE, a high-throughput platform for automated image-guided small-animal irradiation.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Pilot study of neurologic toxicity in mice after proton minibeam therapy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy using animal models of glioblastoma.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Merging Orthovoltage X-Ray Minibeams spare the proximal tissues while producing a solid beam at the target.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Radiation, inflammation and the immune response in cancer.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018Review
- Neurocognitive sparing of desktop microbeam irradiation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Article
- Treating Brain Tumor with Microbeam Radiation Generated by a Compact Carbon-Nanotube-Based Irradiator: Initial Radiation Efficacy Study.Radiation research · 2015Article
- Fiber-optic detector for real time dosimetry of a micro-planar x-ray beam.Medical physics · 2015Article
- Nanotube x-ray for cancer therapy: a compact microbeam radiation therapy system for brain tumor treatment.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2014Review
- Physiologically gated microbeam radiation using a field emission x-ray source array.Medical physics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a promising experimental and preclinical radiotherapy method for cancer treatment. Synchrotron based MRT experiments have shown that spatially fractionated microbeam radiation has the unique capability of preferentially eradicating tumour cells while sparing normal tissue in brain tumour bearing animal models. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of generating orthovoltage microbeam radiation with an adjustable microbeam width using a carbon nanotube based x-ray source array. Here we report the preliminary results from our efforts in developing an image guidance procedure for the targeted delivery of the narrow microbeams to the small tumour region in the mouse brain. Magnetic resonance imaging was used for tumour identification, and on-board x-ray radiography was used for imaging of landmarks without contrast agents. The two images were aligned using 2D rigid body image registration to determine the relative position of the tumour with respect to a landmark. The targeting accuracy and consistency were evaluated by first irradiating a group of mice inoculated with U87 human glioma brain tumours using the present protocol and then determining the locations of the microbeam radiation tracks using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. The histology results showed that among 14 mice irradiated, 11 received the prescribed number of microbeams on the targeted tumour, with an average localization accuracy of 454 µm measured directly from the histology (537 µm if measured from the registered histological images). Two mice received one of the three prescribed microbeams on the tumour site. One mouse was excluded from the analysis due to tissue staining errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.