Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24556621›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Frequent germline deleterious mutations in DNA repair genes in familial prostate cancer cases are associated with advanced disease.

D Leongamornlert, E Saunders, T Dadaev, M Tymrakiewicz, C Goh, S Jugurnauth-Little, I Kozarewa, K Fenwick, I Assiotis, D Barrowdale and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D LeongamornlertDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
E SaundersDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
T DadaevDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
M TymrakiewiczDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
C GohDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
S Jugurnauth-LittleDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
I KozarewaDivision of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
K FenwickDivision of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
I AssiotisDivision of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
D BarrowdaleCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
K GovindasamiDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
M GuyDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
E SawyerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
R WilkinsonDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
UKGPCS Collaborators
A C AntoniouCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
R Eeles1] Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK [2] The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK.
Z Kote-JaraiDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11174Cancer Research UK 15007Cancer Research UK 17528Cancer Research UK C12292/A11174Cancer Research UK C5047/A15007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PrCa) is one of the most common diseases to affect men worldwide and among the leading causes of cancer-related death. The purpose of this study was to use second-generation sequencing technology to assess the frequency of deleterious mutations in 22 tumour suppressor genes in familial PrCa and estimate the relative risk of PrCa if these genes are mutated.

methodsGermline DNA samples from 191 men with 3 or more cases of PrCa in their family were sequenced for 22 tumour suppressor genes using Agilent target enrichment and Illumina technology. Analysis for genetic variation was carried out by using a pipeline consisting of BWA, Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) and ANNOVAR. Clinical features were correlated with mutation status using standard statistical tests. Modified segregation analysis was used to determine the relative risk of PrCa conferred by the putative loss-of-function (LoF) mutations identified.

resultsWe discovered 14 putative LoF mutations in 191 samples (7.3%) and these mutations were more frequently associated with nodal involvement, metastasis or T4 tumour stage (P=0.00164). Segregation analysis of probands with European ancestry estimated that LoF mutations in any of the studied genes confer a relative risk of PrCa of 1.94 (95% CI: 1.56-2.42).

conclusionsThese findings show that LoF mutations in DNA repair pathway genes predispose to familial PrCa and advanced disease and therefore warrants further investigation. The clinical utility of these findings will become increasingly important as targeted screening and therapies become more widespread.

Indexed as

DNA RepairGerm-Line MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRisk

Identifiers

PMID24556621
PMCPMC3960610
OpenAlexW2126668914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.