Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24556618›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Tumour cell retention of rucaparib, sustained PARP inhibition and efficacy of weekly as well as daily schedules.

J Murray, H Thomas, P Berry, S Kyle, M Patterson, C Jones, G Los, Z Hostomsky, E R Plummer, A V Boddy and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Imaging PARP with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J MurrayNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
H ThomasNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
P BerryNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
S KyleNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
M PattersonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
C JonesNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
G LosPfizer Global Research and Development, San Diego, CA, USA.
Z HostomskyPfizer Global Research and Development, San Diego, CA, USA.
E R PlummerNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
A V BoddyNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
N J CurtinNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Framlington Place, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK C240/A7409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) exploit tumour-specific defects in homologous recombination DNA repair and continuous dosing is most efficacious. Early clinical trial data with rucaparib suggested that it caused sustained PARP inhibition. Here we investigate the mechanism of this durable inhibition and potential exploitation.

methodsUptake and retention of rucaparib and persistence of PARP inhibition were determined by radiochemical and immunological assays in human cancer cell lines. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rucaparib were determined in tumour-bearing mice and the efficacy of different schedules of rucaparib was determined in mice bearing homologous recombination DNA repair-defective tumours.

resultsRucaparib accumulation is carrier mediated (Km=8.4±1.2 μM, Vmax=469±22 pmol per 10(6) cells per 10 min), reaching steady-state levels >10 times higher than the extracellular concentration within 30 min. Rucaparib is retained in cells and inhibits PARP ≥50% for ≥72 h days after a 30-min pulse of 400 nM. In Capan-1 tumour-bearing mice rucaparib accumulated and was retained in the tumours, and PARP was inhibited for 7 days following a single dose of 10 mg kg(-1) i.p or 150 mg kg(-1) p.o. by 70% and 90%, respectively. Weekly dosing of 150 mg kg(-1) p.o once a week was as effective as 10 mg kg(-1) i.p daily for five days every week for 6 weeks in delaying Capan-1 tumour growth.

conclusionsRucaparib accumulates and is retained in tumour cells and inhibits PARP for long periods such that weekly schedules have equivalent anticancer activity to daily dosing in a pre-clinical model, suggesting that clinical evaluation of alternative schedules of rucaparib should be considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDNA RepairDrug Administration ScheduleEnzyme InhibitorsHomologous RecombinationHumansIndolesMicePoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysEnzyme InhibitorsIndolesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerasesrucaparib

Identifiers

PMID24556618
PMCPMC3992512
OpenAlexW2042844721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.