ArticleOphthalmic genetics2016
Hereditary Benign Intraepithelial Dyskeratosis: Report of a Case and Re-examination of the Evidence for Locus Heterogeneity.
Article in Ophthalmic genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoinflammatory Keratinization Diseases-The Concept, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Implications.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023Review
- Oral White Lesions: An Updated Clinical Diagnostic Decision Tree.Dentistry journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHereditary benign intraepithelial dyskeratosis (HBID) is a rare autosomal-dominant disorder of the conjunctiva and oral mucosa first described in and predominantly affecting descendents of Haliwa-Saponi Native Americans. We report a spontaneous case of histopathologically-confirmed HBID affecting an individual not of Native American ancestry. MATERIALS AND
methodsReport of a case with histopathologic examination of an excised conjunctival specimen as well as molecular and cytogenetic analysis.
resultsA Caucasian boy with a history of oral lesions and conjunctival injection from birth developed bilateral corneal opacities at age 5 and underwent penetrating keratoplasty, with recurrence of the corneal opacification shortly after surgery. Examination of a conjunctival biopsy specimen revealed features consistent with HBID. Copy number variant (CNV) analysis revealed a de novo 4q35 duplication that overlapped the duplication previously associated with HBID, although no genes were identified in the common interval. NLRP1 gene sequencing failed to reveal a presumed pathogenic variant.
conclusionsHBID may develop de novo in individuals who are not of Native American ancestry. The absence of coding regions in a duplicated region of 4q35 common to both the individual that we report and previously associated with HBID raises questions regarding the significance of this CNV in the pathogenesis of HBID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.