Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24555729›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular ultrasound2014

Predictive role of renal resistive index for clinical outcome after revascularization in hypertensive patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a monocentric observational study.

Rosa Maria Bruno, Elena Daghini, Daniele Versari, Melania Sgrò, Michela Sanna, Luigi Venturini, Caterina Romanini, Irene Di Paco, Isabella Sudano, Roberto Cioni and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. How should we define appropriate patients for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty treatment?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Renal resistive index in hypertensive patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Intravital imaging of the kidney in a rat model of salt-sensitive hypertension.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Renal artery stenosis: if and when to intervene.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Stenting for renal-artery stenosis.The New England journal of medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosa Maria BrunoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. rosam.bruno@gmail.com.
Elena Daghini
Daniele Versari
Melania Sgrò
Michela Sanna
Luigi Venturini
Caterina Romanini
Irene Di Paco
Isabella Sudano
Roberto Cioni
Lilach O Lerman
Lorenzo Ghiadoni
Stefano Taddei
Stefania Pinto
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITMayo Clinic · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study evaluated the predictive value of renal resistive index (RI) for renal function and blood pressure (BP) outcome in hypertensive patients with unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis submitted to successful revascularization.

methodsIn 158 hypertensive patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis RI was acquired. Twelve months after revascularization, they were classified on the basis of renal function and BP outcome as benefit (BP < 140/90 mmHg or diastolic BP reduction > 15 mmHg with the same of reduced drugs; decrease in glomerular filtration rate > 20%), or failure.

resultsRegarding renal function outcome, RI in the stenotic and in the contralateral kidney were significantly higher in patients with failure (n = 20) than in those with benefit (0.72 ± 0.11 vs 0.61 ± 0.11 and 0.76 ± 0.08 vs 0.66 ± 0.09, p < 0.05). Among different cutpoints generated, RI in the contralateral kidney >0.73 provided the largest area under the curve (0.77), and the highest sensitivity (80%) and specificity (72%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, RI in the contralateral kidney >0.73 was an independent predictor of a failure in renal function outcome.Regarding BP outcome, patients with no benefit from revascularization (n = 60) had similar RI in the stenotic and contralateral kidney (p = ns), but presented higher pulse pressure, albuminuria and hypertension duration in comparison to patients with improved BP control.

conclusionsRI in the contralateral kidney is an independent predictor of renal function outcome after successful revascularization in hypertensive patients with unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, whereas it is not able to predict blood pressure outcome.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesHypertension, RenovascularImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRenal Artery ObstructionAtherosclerosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeVascular Resistance

Identifiers

PMID24555729
PMCPMC3937242
OpenAlexW2133875723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.