Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24555566›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2014

Microfluidics-based in vivo mimetic systems for the study of cellular biology.

Donghyuk Kim, Xiaojie Wu, Ashlyn T Young, Christy L Haynes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Application of microfluidic chips in anticancer drug screening.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Development of Controllable Magnetic Driven Microphysiological System.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donghyuk KimDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota , 207 Pleasant Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Xiaojie Wu
Ashlyn T Young
Christy L Haynes
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

IMMUNE SYSTEM-ON-A-CHIP FOR QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CELL INTERACTIONS DURING ALLDP2OD004258 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAYNES, CHRISTY L · 2008 to 2008
$2.3M
NIH HHS DP2 OD004258NIH HHS DP2-OD004258-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body is a complex network of molecules, organelles, cells, tissues, and organs: an uncountable number of interactions and transformations interconnect all the system's components. In addition to these biochemical components, biophysical components, such as pressure, flow, and morphology, and the location of all of these interactions play an important role in the human body. Technical difficulties have frequently limited researchers from observing cellular biology as it occurs within the human body, but some state-of-the-art analytical techniques have revealed distinct cellular behaviors that occur only in the context of the interactions. These types of findings have inspired bioanalytical chemists to provide new tools to better understand these cellular behaviors and interactions. What blocks us from understanding critical biological interactions in the human body? Conventional approaches are often too naïve to provide realistic data and in vivo whole animal studies give complex results that may or may not be relevant for humans. Microfluidics offers an opportunity to bridge these two extremes: while these studies will not model the complexity of the in vivo human system, they can control the complexity so researchers can examine critical factors of interest carefully and quantitatively. In addition, the use of human cells, such as cells isolated from donated blood, captures human-relevant data and limits the use of animals in research. In addition, researchers can adapt these systems easily and cost-effectively to a variety of high-end signal transduction mechanisms, facilitating high-throughput studies that are also spatially, temporally, or chemically resolved. These strengths should allow microfluidic platforms to reveal critical parameters in the human body and provide insights that will help with the translation of pharmacological advances to clinical trials. In this Account, we describe selected microfluidic innovations within the last 5 years that focus on modeling both biophysical and biochemical interactions in cellular communication, such as flow and cell-cell networks. We also describe more advanced systems that mimic higher level biological networks, such as organ on-a-chip and animal on-a-chip models. Since the first papers in the early 1990s, interest in the bioanalytical use of microfluidics has grown significantly. Advances in micro-/nanofabrication technology have allowed researchers to produce miniaturized, biocompatible assay platforms suitable for microfluidic studies in biochemistry and chemical biology. Well-designed microfluidic platforms can achieve quick, in vitro analyses on pico- and femtoliter volume samples that are temporally, spatially, and chemically resolved. In addition, controlled cell culture techniques using a microfluidic platform have produced biomimetic systems that allow researchers to replicate and monitor physiological interactions. Pioneering work has successfully created cell-fluid, cell-cell, cell-tissue, tissue-tissue, even organ-like level interfaces. Researchers have monitored cellular behaviors in these biomimetic microfluidic environments, producing validated model systems to understand human pathophysiology and to support the development of new therapeutics.

Indexed as

Cell BiologyAnimalsBacterial InfectionsBiomimeticsCell CommunicationEquipment DesignHumansImmune SystemLiverLungMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsNeoplasmsTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID24555566
PMCPMC3993883
OpenAlexW2084726488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.