Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24555103›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2013

Protein structure quality assessment based on the distance profiles of consecutive backbone Cα atoms.

Sandeep Chakraborty, Ravindra Venkatramani, Basuthkar J Rao, Bjarni Asgeirsson, Abhaya M Dandekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting interacting hotspots for nanobodies' binding using triplets of residues.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Slice'N'Dice: maximizing the value of predicted models for structural biologists.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DeepTracer for fast de novo cryo-EM protein structure modeling and special studies on CoV-related complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. SUN proteins and nuclear envelope spacing.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandeep ChakrabortyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400 005, India.
Ravindra VenkatramaniDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400 005, India.
Basuthkar J RaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400 005, India.
Bjarni AsgeirssonScience Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, IS-107, Iceland.
Abhaya M DandekarPlant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the three dimensional native state structure of a protein from its primary sequence is an unsolved grand challenge in molecular biology. Two main computational approaches have evolved to obtain the structure from the protein sequence - ab initio/de novo methods and template-based modeling - both of which typically generate multiple possible native state structures. Model quality assessment programs (MQAP) validate these predicted structures in order to identify the correct native state structure. Here, we propose a MQAP for assessing the quality of protein structures based on the distances of consecutive Cα atoms. We hypothesize that the root-mean-square deviation of the distance of consecutive Cα (RDCC) atoms from the ideal value of 3.8 Å, derived from a statistical analysis of high quality protein structures (top100H database), is minimized in native structures. Based on tests with the top100H set, we propose a RDCC cutoff value of 0.012 Å, above which a structure can be filtered out as a non-native structure. We applied the RDCC discriminator on decoy sets from the Decoys 'R' Us database to show that the native structures in all decoy sets tested have RDCC below the 0.012 Å cutoff. While most decoy sets were either indistinguishable using this discriminator or had very few violations, all the decoy structures in the fisa decoy set were discriminated by applying the RDCC criterion. This highlights the physical non-viability of the fisa decoy set, and possible issues in benchmarking other methods using this set. The source code and manual is made available at https://github.com/sanchak/mqap and permanently available on 10.5281/zenodo.7134.

Identifiers

PMID24555103
PMCPMC3892923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.