Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24554930›Full record

ArticleClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases2013

Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women referred to an Italian center for osteoporosis: a single day experience in Messina.

Antonino Catalano, Nancy Morabito, Giorgio Basile, Sergio Fusco, Graziella Castagna, Francesca Reitano, Raffaella Ciano Albanese, Antonino Lasco

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Incidence of hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients: Is it changing?Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonino CatalanoUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Nancy MorabitoUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giorgio BasileUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Sergio FuscoUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Graziella CastagnaUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Francesca ReitanoUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Raffaella Ciano AlbaneseUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonino LascoUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major cause of fragility fractures and these are responsible of large social burden; nevertheless, osteoporosis often remains an underdiagnosed disease. FRAX is a new and simple validate fracture risk assessment tool helping physicians to select patients at high risk of future fragility fractures. To promote early diagnosis of osteoporosis, we evaluated fracture risk by FRAX and performed phalangeal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements in a population of postmenopausal women referring to our center during the World Osteoporosis Day on 20th October 2011. Eighty post-menopausal women (age 60.8±8.6) were screened and the risk of major osteoporotic and hip fractures over ten years was calculated by considering multiple clinical risk factors (CRFs). The median risk of major osteoporotic fracture (%) was 4.9 (3.5-8.6) in women younger than 55 years, 7.3 (5.4-11) in women aged between 55 and 65 years and 17.5 (11-27) in women older than 65 years; the median risk of hip fracture (%) was 0.6 (0.3-1.3), 1.5 (0.9-2.5) and 7.2 (3.1-14) respectively. QUS measurements, were lower in the older women and when multiple CRFs coexisted, and were found to correlate with fracture risk, especially with hip fracture risk (p<0.05). Within one month from the screening, 75% (44/59) of the women over 55 years came back and received a diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); a positive association between DXA and QUS measurements was observed (p<0.0001). Adequate treatment of these subjects could reduce fracture rates, improve the quality of life, and reduce the social costs of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

fragility fracturesFRAXosteoporosispreventionquantitative ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID24554930
PMCPMC3917582
OpenAlexW2202710289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.