Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24554921›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2011

Thermodynamic Properties of Water Molecules at a Protein-Protein Interaction Surface.

David J Huggins, May Marsh, Mike C Payne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure and Stabilities of Solution and Gas Phase Protein Complexes.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  5. Structural Insights of PD-1/PD-L1 Axis: AnCurrent protein & peptide science · 2024
    Article
  6. WaterKit: Thermodynamic Profiling of Protein Hydration Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J HugginsCambridge Molecular Therapeutics Programme, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge , Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom ; Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road, Cambridge, UK CB2 1EW, United Kingdom ; TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge , 19 J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom.
May MarshCambridge Molecular Therapeutics Programme, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge , Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom ; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge , Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK CB2 1QW, United Kingdom.
Mike C PayneCambridge Molecular Therapeutics Programme, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge , Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom ; TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge , 19 J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have been identified as a vital regulator of cellular pathways and networks. However, the determinants that control binding affinity and specificity at protein surfaces are incompletely characterized and thus unable to be exploited for the purpose of developing PPI inhibitors to control cellular pathways in disease states. One of the key factors in intermolecular interactions that remains poorly understood is the role of water molecules and in particular the importance of solvent entropy. This factor is expected to be particularly important at protein surfaces, and the release of water molecules from hydrophobic regions is one of the most important drivers of PPIs. In this work, we have studied the protein surface of a mutant of the protein RadA to quantify the thermodynamics of surface water molecules. RadA and its human homologue RAD51 function as recombinases in the process of homologous recombination. RadA binds to itself to form oligomeric structures and thus contains a well-characterized protein-protein binding surface. Similarly, RAD51 binds either to itself to form oligomers or to the protein BRCA2 to form filaments. X-ray crystallography has determined that the same interface functions in both interactions. Work in our group has generated a partially humanized mutant of RadA, termed MAYM, which has been crystallized in the apo form. We studied this apo form of MAYM using a combination of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and inhomogeneous fluid solvation theory (IFST). The method locates a number of the hydration sites observed in the crystal structure and locates hydrophobic sites where hydrophobic species are known to bind experimentally. The simulations also highlight the importance of the restraints placed on the protein in determining the results. Finally, the results identify a correlation between the predicted entropy of water molecules at a given site and the solvent-accessible surface area and suggest that correlations between water molecules only need to be considered for water molecules separated by less than 3.2 Å. The combination of MD and IFST has been used previously to study PPIs and represents one of the few existing methods to quantify solvent thermodynamics. This is a vital aspect of molecular recognition and one which we believe must be developed.

Identifiers

PMID24554921
PMCPMC3924879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.