ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds II: single-neuron recordings.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of postural load and early aging on dynamic sound localization: Evidence for reduced cognitive-motor reserve.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Noises on-How the Brain Deals with Acoustic Noise.Biology · 2024Review
- Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Auditory Brainstem Models: Adapting Cochlear Nuclei Improve Spatial Encoding by the Medial Superior Olive in Reverberation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- The impact of peripheral mechanisms on the precedence effect.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Effects of age on sensitivity to interaural time differences in envelope and fine structure, individually and in combination.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Can monaural temporal masking explain the ongoing precedence effect?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Influence of envelope waveform on ITD sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Neural coding of time-varying interaural time differences and time-varying amplitude in the inferior colliculus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Input timing for spatial processing is precisely tuned via constant synaptic delays and myelination patterns in the auditory brainstem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Exploring binaural hearing in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) using virtual headphones.PloS one · 2017Article
- Physiology and anatomy of neurons in the medial superior olive of the mouse.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences Conveyed in the Stimulus Envelope: Estimating Inputs of Binaural Neurons Through the Temporal Analysis of Spike Trains.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016Article
- Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.Trends in hearing · 2015Article
- Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
- A Neural Model of Auditory Space Compatible with Human Perception under Simulated Echoic Conditions.PloS one · 2015Article
- Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. IV. Effects of carrier frequency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014Article
- The natural history of sound localization in mammals--a story of neuronal inhibition.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, with the use of an amplitude-modulated binaural beat (AMBB), in which sound amplitude and interaural-phase difference (IPD) were modulated with a fixed mutual relationship (Dietz et al. 2013b), we demonstrated that the human auditory system uses interaural timing differences in the temporal fine structure of modulated sounds only during the rising portion of each modulation cycle. However, the degree to which peripheral or central mechanisms contribute to the observed strong dominance of the rising slope remains to be determined. Here, by recording responses of single neurons in the medial superior olive (MSO) of anesthetized gerbils and in the inferior colliculus (IC) of anesthetized guinea pigs to AMBBs, we report a correlation between the position within the amplitude-modulation (AM) cycle generating the maximum response rate and the position at which the instantaneous IPD dominates the total neural response. The IPD during the rising segment dominates the total response in 78% of MSO neurons and 69% of IC neurons, with responses of the remaining neurons predominantly coding the IPD around the modulation maximum. The observed diversity of dominance regions within the AM cycle, especially in the IC, and its comparison with the human behavioral data suggest that only the subpopulation of neurons with rising slope dominance codes the sound-source location in complex listening conditions. A comparison of two models to account for the data suggests that emphasis on IPDs during the rising slope of the AM cycle depends on adaptation processes occurring before binaural interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.