Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24554461›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold.

Marlies Karsch-Völk, Bruce Barrett, David Kiefer, Rudolf Bauer, Karin Ardjomand-Woelkart, Klaus Linde

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
65.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 382 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Heated, humidified air for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Garlic for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Pharmacological Insights and Technological Innovations inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marlies Karsch-VölkInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin/Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München/Klinikum rechts der Isar, Orlansstr. 47, München, Germany, 81667.
Bruce Barrett
David Kiefer
Rudolf Bauer
Karin Ardjomand-Woelkart
Klaus Linde
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Research Training in Complementary and Alternative MedicineT32AT006956 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARRETT, BRUCE P · 2011 to 2017
$1.5M
Placebo: Physician or Pill? RCT in a commom cold modelR01AT001428 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARRETT, BRUCE P · 2003 to 2006
$1.2M
Mentoring and research in patient-oriented medicineK24AT006543 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARRETT, BRUCE P · 2012 to 2016
$818k
Intramural NIH HHSNCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT006543NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT006956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEchinacea plant preparations (family Asteraceae) are widely used in Europe and North America for common colds. Most consumers and physicians are not aware that products available under the term Echinacea differ appreciably in their composition, mainly due to the use of variable plant material, extraction methods and the addition of other components.

objectivesTo assess whether there is evidence that Echinacea preparations are effective and safe compared to placebo in the prevention and treatment of the common cold. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 5, MEDLINE (1946 to May week 5, 2013), EMBASE (1991 to June 2013), CINAHL (1981 to June 2013), AMED (1985 to February 2012), LILACS (1981 to June 2013), Web of Science (1955 to June 2013), CAMBASE (no time limits), the Centre for Complementary Medicine Research (1988 to September 2007), WHO ICTRP and clinicaltrials.gov (last searched 5 June 2013), screened references and asked experts in the field about published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mono-preparations of Echinacea with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted data. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of individuals with at least one cold in prevention trials and the duration of colds in treatment trials. For all included trials the primary safety and acceptability outcome was the number of participants dropping out due to adverse events. We assessed trial quality using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. MAIN

resultsTwenty-four double-blind trials with 4631 participants including a total of 33 comparisons of Echinacea preparations and placebo met the inclusion criteria. A variety of different Echinacea preparations based on different species and parts of plant were used. Evidence from seven trials was available for preparations based on the aerial parts of Echinacea purpurea. Ten trials were considered to have a low risk of bias, six to have an unclear risk of bias and eight to have a high risk of bias. Ten trials with 13 comparisons investigated prevention and 15 trials with 20 comparisons investigated treatment of colds (one trial addressed both prevention and treatment).Due to the strong clinical heterogeneity of the studies we refrained from pooling for the main analysis. None of the 12 prevention comparisons reporting the number of patients with at least one cold episode found a statistically significant difference. However a post hoc pooling of their results, suggests a relative risk reduction of 10% to 20%. Of the seven treatment trials reporting data on the duration of colds, only one showed a significant effect of Echinacea over placebo. The number of patients dropping out or reporting adverse effects did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups in prevention and treatment trials. However, in prevention trials there was a trend towards a larger number of patients dropping out due to adverse events in the treatment groups. AUTHORS'

conclusionsEchinacea products have not here been shown to provide benefits for treating colds, although, it is possible there is a weak benefit from some Echinacea products: the results of individual prophylaxis trials consistently show positive (if non-significant) trends, although potential effects are of questionable clinical relevance.

Indexed as

EchinaceaPhytotherapyCommon ColdHumansPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID24554461
PMCPMC4068831
OpenAlexW2091614628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.