Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24554442›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2014

How can research keep up with eHealth? Ten strategies for increasing the timeliness and usefulness of eHealth research.

Timothy B Baker, David H Gustafson, Dhavan Shah

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy B BakerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States. tbb@ctri.medicine.wisc.edu.
David H Gustafson
Dhavan Shah

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Using Technology to Enhance Cancer Communication and Improve Clinical OutcomesP50CA095817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2003 to 2012
$19.3M
Methods CoreP50CA143188 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BOLT, DANIEL M · 2009 to 2013
$10.5M
Developing and Testing a Computer-Based Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery SystemR01AA017192 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095817NCI NIH HHS P50CA095817NCI NIH HHS P50 CA143188NCI NIH HHS P50CA143188-11NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017192NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA017192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth interventions appear and change so quickly that they challenge the way we conduct research. By the time a randomized trial of a new intervention is published, technological improvements and clinical discoveries may make the intervention dated and unappealing. This and the spate of health-related apps and websites may lead consumers, patients, and caregivers to use interventions that lack evidence of efficacy.

objectiveThis paper aims to offer strategies for increasing the speed and usefulness of eHealth research.

methodsThe paper describes two types of strategies based on the authors' own research and the research literature: those that improve the efficiency of eHealth research, and those that improve its quality.

resultsEfficiency strategies include: (1) think small: conduct small studies that can target discrete but significant questions and thereby speed knowledge acquisition; (2) use efficient designs: use such methods as fractional-factorial and quasi-experimental designs and surrogate endpoints, and experimentally modify and evaluate interventions and delivery systems already in use; (3) study universals: focus on timeless behavioral, psychological, and cognitive principles and systems; (4) anticipate the next big thing: listen to voices outside normal practice and connect different perspectives for new insights; (5) improve information delivery systems: researchers should apply their communications expertise to enhance inter-researcher communication, which could synergistically accelerate progress and capitalize upon the availability of "big data"; and (6) develop models, including mediators and moderators: valid models are remarkably generative, and tests of moderation and mediation should elucidate boundary conditions of effects and treatment mechanisms. Quality strategies include: (1) continuous quality improvement: researchers need to borrow engineering practices such as the continuous enhancement of interventions to incorporate clinical and technological progress; (2) help consumers identify quality: consumers, clinicians, and others all need to easily identify quality, suggesting the need to efficiently and publicly index intervention quality; (3) reduce the costs of care: concern with health care costs can drive intervention adoption and use and lead to novel intervention effects (eg, reduced falls in the elderly); and (4) deeply understand users: a rigorous evaluation of the consumer's needs is a key starting point for intervention development.

conclusionsThe challenges of distinguishing and distributing scientifically validated interventions are formidable. The strategies described are meant to spur discussion and further thinking, which are important, given the potential of eHealth interventions to help patients and families.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchTelemedicineHistory, 20th CenturyHumansQuality ImprovementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designexperimental designshealth communicationInternetpatient educationpatient engagementrandomized clinical trialsresearch techniquessocial mediatelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID24554442
PMCPMC3961695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.