ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2014
The efficacy and safety of intravenous hydralazine for the treatment of hypertension in the hospitalized child.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of Hypertension in Children.Current hypertension reviews · 2024Review
- Antihypertensive agents: a long way to safe drug prescribing in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
- Identification of hypertension in hospitalized children prescribed as-needed antihypertensive medication.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- A Practical Guide to the Management of Severe Hypertension in Children.Paediatric drugs · 2020Article
- Evaluation and management of elevated blood pressures in hospitalized children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Review
- Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of metoprolol infusion for children and adolescents with hypertensive crises: a retrospective case series.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Evaluation and treatment of hypertensive crises in children.Integrated blood pressure control · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous (IV) hydralazine is frequently used for the treatment of elevated blood pressure (BP) in hospitalized children. Its safety and efficacy have not been examined.
methodsThis is a retrospective chart review of IV hydralazine use in hospitalized children (birth to 17 years) over a 3-year period. Demographic data and data on adverse effects (AE), BP, and heart rate (HR) prior to and after each first dose were collected.
resultsThe patient cohort comprised 110 children admitted to the hospital during the study period, of whom 77 received the recommended dose. Mean age of the children was 8.5 ± 5.4 years; 33 % were male, and 32.5 % were white. Pre-dose systolic and diastolic BP indexes were 1.3 and 1.2, respectively. The median reduction in systolic and diastolic BP was 8.5 and 11.5 %, respectively. Sixteen (21 %) children achieved a 25 % reduction in systolic or diastolic BP, and BP increased in 30 % of patients; 10 % of children had a BP of <95th percentile for age, sex, and height after one dose. Seven (9 %) children had a documented AE. HR increased by a median of 3.5 %. In the multivariable models examining percentage change in systolic and diastolic BP, male gender was significantly associated with a change in systolic BP.
conclusionsIn hospitalized children, IV hydralazine was well tolerated, BP response was variable, and 21 % of the patients achieved a ≥25 % reduction of systolic or diastolic BP. Further studies are needed to compare the safety and efficacy of IV hydralazine to other short-acting antihypertensive agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.