Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24553936›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Highly informative natural scene regions increase microsaccade production during visual scanning.

Michael B McCamy, Jorge Otero-Millan, Leandro Luigi Di Stasi, Stephen L Macknik, Susana Martinez-Conde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensory Input Modulates Microsaccades during Heading Perception.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Learning to silence saccadic suppression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microsaccade generation requires a foveal anchor.Journal of eye movement research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. VisME: Visual Microsaccades Explorer.Journal of eye movement research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael B McCamyDepartments of Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Vigo, E-36310 Vigo, Spain, and Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
Jorge Otero-Millan
Leandro Luigi Di Stasi
Stephen L Macknik
Susana Martinez-Conde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical image statistics, such as contrast, entropy, and the correlation between central and nearby pixel intensities, are thought to guide ocular fixation targeting. However, these statistics are not necessarily task relevant and therefore do not provide a complete picture of the relationship between informativeness and ocular targeting. Moreover, it is not known whether either informativeness or classical image statistics affect microsaccade production; thus, the role of microsaccades in information acquisition is also unknown. The objective quantification of the informativeness of a scene region is a major challenge, because it can vary with both image features and the task of the viewer. Thus, previous definitions of informativeness suffered from subjectivity and inconsistency across studies. Here we developed an objective measure of informativeness based on fixation consistency across human observers, which accounts for both bottom-up and top-down influences in ocular targeting. We then analyzed fixations in more versus less informative image regions in relation to classical statistics. Observers generated more microsaccades on more informative than less informative image regions, and such regions also exhibited low redundancy in their classical statistics. Increased microsaccade production was not explained by increased fixation duration, suggesting that the visual system specifically uses microsaccades to heighten information acquisition from informative regions.

Indexed as

Photic StimulationAlgorithmsBlinkingEntropyFaceFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleSaccadesVision, OcularVisual PerceptionYoung Adultfixation durationnatural imagessaccadesscanpathscene statisticsvisual search

Identifiers

PMID24553936
PMCPMC6608512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.