Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24553915›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2014

Out of the blue: the spectral sensitivity of hummingbird hawkmoths.

Francismeire Jane Telles, Olle Lind, Miriam Judith Henze, Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Gironés, Joaquin Goyret, Almut Kelber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of spectral orientation in a diurnal dung beetle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Molecular advances to study the function, evolution and spectral tuning of arthropod visual opsins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Automated methods for efficient and accurate electroretinography.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fuelling on the wing: sensory ecology of hawkmoth foraging.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The eyes and vision of butterflies.The Journal of physiology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Innate colour preferences of the Australian native stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria Sm.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A hundred years of color studies in insects: with thanks to Karl von Frisch and the workers he inspired.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Francismeire Jane TellesLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, 22362, Lund, Sweden.
Olle Lind
Miriam Judith Henze
Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Gironés
Joaquin Goyret
Almut Kelber
Lund University · SEConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European hummingbird hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum is a diurnal nectar forager like the honeybee, and we expect similarities in their sensory ecology. Using behavioural tests and electroretinograms (ERGs), we studied the spectral sensitivity of M. stellatarum. By measuring ERGs in the dark-adapted eye and after adaptation to green light, we determined that M. stellatarum has ultraviolet (UV), blue and green receptors maximally sensitive at 349, 440 and 521 nm, and confirmed that green receptors are most frequent in the retina. To determine the behavioural spectral sensitivity (action spectrum) of foraging moths, we trained animals to associate a disk illuminated with spectral light, with a food reward, and a dark disk with no reward. While the spectral positions of sensitivity maxima found in behavioural tests agree with model predictions based on the ERG data, the sensitivity to blue light was 30 times higher than expected. This is different from the honeybee but similar to earlier findings in the crepuscular hawkmoth Manduca sexta. It may indicate that the action spectrum of foraging hawkmoths does not represent their general sensory capacity. We suggest that the elevated sensitivity to blue light is related to the innate preference of hawkmoths for blue flowers.

Indexed as

ColorAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsColor PerceptionColor VisionElectroretinographyFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesMothsSpectrum Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24553915
OpenAlexW1969361333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.