Trial reportJAMA dermatology2014
Clinical skin examination outcomes after a video-based behavioral intervention: analysis from a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Trial
- Assessing the Potential for Patient-led Surveillance After Treatment of Localized Melanoma (MEL-SELF): A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA dermatology · 2022Trial
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis and return on investment of SunSmart Western Australia to prevent skin cancer.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- The effects of exposure to solar radiation on human health.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023Article
- Improving knowledge of hair loss disorders: Assessing the efficacy of a dermatologist-developed social media video library for patient education.JAAD international · 2022Article
- Article
- Prevention versus early detection for long-term control of melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas: a cost-effectiveness modelling study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Skin cancer interventions across the cancer control continuum: A review of experimental evidence (1/1/2000-6/30/2015) and future research directions.Preventive medicine · 2018Review
- Skin cancer interventions across the cancer control continuum: Review of technology, environment, and theory.Preventive medicine · 2018Review
- Evaluation of a Skin Self-Examination Programme: a Four-Stage Recursive ModelAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Article
- "Melanoma: Questions and Answers." Development and evaluation of a psycho-educational resource for people with a history of melanoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Total skin self-examination at home for people treated for cutaneous melanoma: development and pilot of a digital intervention.BMJ open · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceOlder men are at risk of dying of melanoma.
objectiveTo assess attendance at and clinical outcomes of clinical skin examinations (CSEs) in older men exposed to a video-based behavioral intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis was a behavioral randomized clinical trial of a video-based intervention in men aged at least 50 years. Between June 1 and August 31, 2008, men were recruited, completed baseline telephone interviews, and were than randomized to receive either a video-based intervention (n = 469) or brochures only (n = 461; overall response rate, 37.1%) and were again interviewed 7 months later (n = 870; 93.5% retention).
interventionsVideo on skin self-examination and skin awareness and written informational materials. The control group received written materials only. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Participants who reported a CSE were asked for the type of CSE (skin spot, partial body, or whole body), who initiated it, whether the physician noted any suspicious lesions, and, if so, how lesions were managed. Physicians completed a case report form that included the type of CSE, who initiated it, the number of suspicious lesions detected, how lesions were managed (excision, nonsurgical treatment, monitoring, or referral), and pathology reports after lesion excision or biopsy.
resultsOverall, 540 of 870 men (62.1%) self-reported a CSE since receiving intervention materials, and 321 of 540 (59.4%) consented for their physician to provide medical information (received for 266 of 321 [82.9%]). Attendance of any CSE was similar between groups (intervention group, 246 of 436 [56.4%]; control group, 229 of 434 [52.8%]), but men in the intervention group were more likely to self-report a whole-body CSE (154 of 436 [35.3%] vs 118 of 434 [27.2%] for control group; P = .01). Two melanomas, 29 squamous cell carcinomas, and 38 basal cell carcinomas were diagnosed, with a higher proportion of malignant lesions in the intervention group (60.0% vs 40.0% for controls; P = .03). Baseline attitudes, behaviors, and skin cancer history were associated with higher odds of CSE and skin cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A video-based intervention may increase whole-body CSE and skin cancer diagnosis in older men.
trial registrationanzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12608000384358.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.