Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24553605›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo

Evaluation of four different DNA extraction methods in coagulase-negative staphylococci clinical isolates.

Caio Fernando de Oliveira, Thiago Galvão da Silva Paim, Keli Cristine Reiter, Alexandre Rieger, Pedro Alves D'Azevedo

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Epidemiology ofOman medical journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Association ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance factors inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  10. Pathogenic bacteria in cheese, raw and pasteurised milk.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021
    Article
  11. Persister cells as a possible cause of antibiotic therapy failure inJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Distribution ofJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caio Fernando de OliveiraHealth Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Health Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA).
Thiago Galvão da Silva PaimHealth Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Health Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA).
Keli Cristine ReiterHealth Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Health Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA).
Alexandre RiegerLaboratory of Biotechnology and Genetic, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC), Laboratory of Biotechnology and Genetic, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC).
Pedro Alves D'AzevedoHealth Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Health Sciences Post-graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA).
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade de Santa Cruz do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently there are several methods to extract bacterial DNA based on different principles. However, the amount and the quality of the DNA obtained by each one of those methods is highly variable and microorganism dependent, as illustrated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) which have a thick cell wall that is difficult to lyse. This study was designed to compare the quality and the amount of CoNS DNA, extracted by four different techniques: two in-house protocols and two commercial kits. DNA amount and quality determination was performed through spectrophotometry. The extracted DNA was also analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and by PCR. 267 isolates of CoNS were used in this study. The column method and thermal lyses showed better results with regard to DNA quality (mean ratio of A260/280 = 1.95) and average concentration of DNA (), respectively. All four methods tested provided appropriate DNA for PCR amplification, but with different yields. DNA quality is important since it allows the application of a large number of molecular biology techniques, and also it's storage for a longer period of time. In this sense the extraction method based on an extraction column presented the best results for CoNS.

Indexed as

CoagulaseBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSpecimen HandlingStaphylococcusCoagulaseDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24553605
PMCPMC4085835
OpenAlexW2025060230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.