ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014
Toward a mechanism-based in vitro safety test for pertussis toxin.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- iGIST-A Kinetic Bioassay for Pertussis Toxin Based on Its Effect on Inhibitory GPCR Signaling.ACS sensors · 2020Article
- Review
- Alternatives to HIST for acellular pertussis vaccines: progress and challenges in replacement.Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pertussis vaccines are routinely administered to infants to protect them from whooping cough. Still, an adequate safety test for pertussis toxin (PT), one of the main antigens in these vaccines, is not available. The histamine sensitization test is currently the only assay accepted by regulatory authorities to test for the absence of active PT in vaccines. This is however, a lethal animal test with poor reproducibility. In addition, it is not clear whether the assumed underlying mechanism, i.e., ADP-ribosylation of G proteins, is the only effect that should be considered in safety evaluation of PT. The in vitro safety test for PT that we developed is based on the clinical effects of PT in humans. For this, human cell lines were chosen based on the cell types involved in the clinical effects of PT. These cell lines were exposed to PT and analyzed by microarray. In this review, we discuss the clinical effects of PT and the mechanisms that underlie them. The approach taken may provide as an example for other situations in which an in vitro assay based on clinical effects in humans is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.