Trial reportBJU international2015
Long-term oncological outcomes of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer.
Trial report in BJU international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Local Effects of Systemic Therapies in Urological Oncology: A Systematic Review.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapies for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant hormone therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of andrologyPooled it
- The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in combination with radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Radical Prostatectomy in Multimodal Setting: Current Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Hormonal or Chemotherapy-Based Treatments.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate, and bicalutamide in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Androgen deprivation therapy, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a multi-center real-world retrospective study.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Review
- Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2020Review
- Consensus statements on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.BJU international · 2019Review
- Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.Current urology reports · 2016Review
- [Multimodal therapy of locally advanced prostate cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
- Role of chemotherapy in prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine long-term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) for clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this phase II multicentre trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA level >20 ng/mL, Gleason ≥8, or clinical stage ≥T3), androgen-deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered before RP. We report the long-term oncological outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncological inclusion criteria but received RP only.
resultsIn all, 34 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients had biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10-37%). However, the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66-93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60-89%). The CHT group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (123 patients), with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.34; P = 0.3) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.29; P = 0.2) although these were not statistically significant.
conclusionsNeoadjuvant CHT followed by RP was associated with lower rates of BCR and metastasis compared with the RP-only group; however, these results were not statistically significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.