Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24552276›Full record

Trial reportBJU international2015

Long-term oncological outcomes of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer.

Jonathan L Silberstein, Stephen A Poon, Daniel D Sjoberg, Alexandra C Maschino, Andrew J Vickers, Aaron Bernie, Badrinath R Konety, W Kevin Kelly, James A Eastham

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJU international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan L SilbersteinDepartment of Urology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Stephen A PoonDepartment of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group- Fontana Medical Center, Fontana, CA, USA.
Daniel D SjobergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra C MaschinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew J VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron BernieUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Badrinath R KonetyDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
W Kevin KellyDepartments of Urology and Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James A EasthamUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USTulane University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL P SILVER · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
UROLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32CA082088 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Brett Stewart Carver · 1999 to 2026
$7.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036NCI NIH HHS T32 CA082088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine long-term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) for clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this phase II multicentre trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA level >20 ng/mL, Gleason ≥8, or clinical stage ≥T3), androgen-deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered before RP. We report the long-term oncological outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncological inclusion criteria but received RP only.

resultsIn all, 34 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients had biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10-37%). However, the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66-93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60-89%). The CHT group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (123 patients), with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.34; P = 0.3) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.29; P = 0.2) although these were not statistically significant.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant CHT followed by RP was associated with lower rates of BCR and metastasis compared with the RP-only group; however, these results were not statistically significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinDisease-Free SurvivalEstramustineHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinEstramustinePaclitaxelchemotherapyhormone therapyneoadjuvantprostate neoplasmsradical prostatectomysurvival

Identifiers

PMID24552276
PMCPMC4219923
OpenAlexW2144874058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.