ReviewInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine2013
Polymorphism of genes and implantation failure.
Review in International journal of molecular and cellular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the Nitric Oxide Axis in IVF: Genotype Associations in Antagonist Cycles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- From bench to in silico and backwards: What have we done on genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure and where should we go next?Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Endometrial receptivity defects MUC-1 and COX-2 polymorphisms in endometriosis.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
- Construction of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in the pathogenesis of recurrent implantation failure using integrated bioinformatics study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Non-invasive Embryo Assessment: Altered Individual Protein Profile in Spent Culture Media from Embryos Transferred at Day 5.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Endometrial gene expression profiling of recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing RevealsCells · 2020Article
- Altered Expression of GABPB1-IT1 and SLC9A3-AS1 Long Non-Coding RNAs in Recurrent Implantation Failure.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
- Genetic Factors of Idiopathic Recurrent Miscarriage in Kazakh Population.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
- Immunogenetic aspects of idiopathic recurrent miscarriage in the Kazakh population.Journal of medicine and lifeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantation failure is the most frequent cause of pregnancy loss in couples who try to conceive, either in a natural way or using assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Identify the precise mechanisms of implantation failure can lead to identify couples at risk and also providing appropriate therapeutic options to affected couples. Despite the high prevalence of this disorder, a few causing factors are demonstrated so far. Recent studies indicate that genetic factors play an important role in the occurrence of recurrent implantation failure. Although some of these factors, such as numerical chromosomal aneuploidy are known to be causative factors, there are some other factors that solely increase susceptibility to this event. In the present review we try to list the genetic polymorphisms that are known as susceptibility factors in implantation failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24551783PMC3920519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.