Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551649›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2013

Quantitative Micro-albuminuria Assessment from 'Random Voided Urinary Albumin: Creatinine Ratio' Versus '24 hours Urinary Albumin Concentration' for Screening of Diabetic Nephropathy.

Monika Pathania, Vyas Kumar Rathaur, Neeraj Yadav, Aparna Jayara, Aditi Chaturvedi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MicroRNAs in the Progress of Diabetic Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monika PathaniaAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, VCSGGMS & RI , Uttrakhand, India .
Vyas Kumar RathaurAssistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, VCSGGMS & RI , Uttrakhand, India .
Neeraj YadavIntern, Department of Medicine VCSGGMS & RI , Srinagar, Uttrakhand, India .
Aparna JayaraIntern, VCSGGMS & RI , Uttrakhand, India .
Aditi ChaturvediAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, VCSGGMS & RI , Uttrakhand, India .
Uttarakhand Technical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aims at assessing the predictive value of random urine A:C ratio as a screening method for Micro-albuminuria assessment in DM patients as compared to 24 hours urine albumin. SETTINGS AND

designA cross sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary care centre. One hundred ninty three patients diagnosed with DM were enrolled in the study but 14 participants didn't turn up with 24 hours urine sample. Thus, 179 people actually participated in the study. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll DM patients who attended Out Patient Departments (OPDs) and In Patient Departments (IPDs) of Medicine, Surgery and Orthopaedics, were enrolled. Proper history about development and duration of DM was taken from the patients. Examination in the form of height and weight measurement to know Body Mass Index (BMI), the Waist: Hip Ratio (W:H ratio) calculated from waist and hip circumference and blood pressure measurement was done. Fasting blood sugar was measured in the study group. [Urine analysis was done for urinary albumin and urinary creatinine]. Two urine samples were collected from each participant; one, 24 hours sample and the other random urine sample. 24 hours urine samples were used to measure urinary albumin concentration while urinary albumin to creatinine ratio was measured from random urine sample. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: SPSS 17.

resultsTwenty four hours RUA:C ratio has very good sensitivity and specificity of Sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% and 95.8% respectively,which makes it a better alternative to 24 hours UAC. Negative and positive predictive values of RUA:C ratio method are 0.93 and 0.090 respectively with false negative and false positive rates, 15.1% and 4.2 % respectively.

conclusionTwenty four hours UAC is considered gold standard for screening of Micro-albuminuria but is cumbersome to collect 24 hours urine sample especially in OPD setup and in female patients. This leads to loss of compliance thereby preventing early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. This problem is more impracticable in hilly regions of India. By using random urine sample for screening of Micro-albuminuria in the form of RUA: C in random urine sample that correlates well with 24 hours UAC in 24 hours urine sample,is easier and more practical in Indian scenario especially in diabetics residing in hills.

Indexed as

CreatinineDiabetes mellitusDiabetic nephropathyMacro albuminuriaProteinuriaUrine sample

Identifiers

PMID24551649
PMCPMC3919350
OpenAlexW2074173476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.