Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551414›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013

Local health department translation processes: potential of machine translation technologies to help meet needs.

Anne M Turner, Hannah Mandel, Daniel Capurro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne M TurnerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Hannah MandelUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Daniel CapurroUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA ; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago, Chile.

Funding

Improving access to multi-lingual health information through machine translationR01LM010811 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KIRCHHOFF, KATRIN, TURNER, ANNE M · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM010811-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited English proficiency (LEP), defined as a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English, is associated with health disparities. Despite federal and state requirements to translate health information, the vast majority of health materials are solely available in English. This project investigates barriers to translation of health information and explores new technologies to improve access to multilingual public health materials. We surveyed all 77 local health departments (LHDs) in the Northwest about translation needs, practices, barriers and attitudes towards machine translation (MT). We received 67 responses from 45 LHDs. Translation of health materials is the principle strategy used by LHDs to reach LEP populations. Cost and access to qualified translators are principle barriers to producing multilingual materials. Thirteen LHDs have used online MT tools. Many respondents expressed concerns about the accuracy of MT. Overall, respondents were positive about its potential use, if low costs and quality could be assured.

Indexed as

ComputersConsumer Health InformationMultilingualismTranslatingAttitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionHumansLocal GovernmentNorthwestern United StatesPublic Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID24551414
PMCPMC3900152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.