ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013
Supporting shared decision making within the MobiGuide project.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Web-Based Just-in-Time Information and Feedback on Antibiotic Use for Village Doctors in Rural Anhui, China: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Trial
- Impact of Illness on Electronic Health Use (The Seventh Tromsø Study - Part 2): Population-Based Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Shared Decision-Making Ontology for a Healthcare Team Executing a Workflow, an Instantiation for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Management.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Review
- Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2015Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes our approach for fostering and facilitating communication among patients and caregivers in the context of shared decision making, i.e., when decisions must be taken not only on the basis of scientific evidence but also of the patient's preferences and context. This happens because clinical practice guidelines cannot provide recommendations for every possible situation, and cannot foresee every change in a patient's context, which might imply the deviation from a previously acknowledged recommendation. Within the EU-funded project MobiGuide (www.mobiguide-project.eu), supporting remote patient management, we propose decision theory as a methodological framework for a tool that, during face to face encounters, is used to tailor pre-defined, generic decision models to the individual patient, by involving the patient himself in the customization of the model parameters. Although this approach is not appropriate for all patients, it leads, in well-chosen cases, to a more informed choice, with potentially better treatment compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24551401PMC3900138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.