Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551380›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013

Genetic variants improve breast cancer risk prediction on mammograms.

Jie Liu, David Page, Houssam Nassif, Jude Shavlik, Peggy Peissig, Catherine McCarty, Adedayo A Onitilo, Elizabeth Burnside

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Temporal Poisson Square Root Graphical Models.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Discriminatory power of common genetic variants in personalized breast cancer diagnosis.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing a clinical utility framework to evaluate prediction models in radiogenomics.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2015
    Article
  8. Leveraging Interaction between Genetic Variants and Mammographic Findings for Personalized Breast Cancer Diagnosis.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015
    Article
  9. New genetic variants improve personalized breast cancer diagnosis.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie LiuUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
David PageUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Houssam NassifUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Jude ShavlikUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Peggy PeissigMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Catherine McCartyEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, MN, USA.
Adedayo A OnitiloDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Marshfield Clinic Weston Center, Weston, WI, USA ; Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA ; School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Elizabeth BurnsideUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Machine Learning for Identifying Adverse Drug EventsR01GM097618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL DEFOIX, HANSEN, RICHARD A. · 2011 to 2018
$3.8M
Secure Sharing of Clinical History & Genetic Data: Empowering Predictive Pers. MeR01LM011028 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PAGE, CHARLES DAVID · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
Breast Cancer GWAS: Function and Environmental InteractionsR01ES017400 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOULD, MICHAEL N, NEWTON, MICHAEL A · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Informatics Techniques to Optimize Mammography for Aging PopulationsR01CA165229 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Machine Learning for Improved Mammography ScreeningR01CA127379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 3R01CA127379-03S1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127379NCI NIH HHS R01CA127379-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165229NIEHS NIH HHS 5R01ES017400-03NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017400NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097618NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM097618-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011028NLM NIH HHS R01LM011028-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent genome-wide association studies have identified genetic variants associated with breast cancer. However, how much these genetic variants may help advance breast cancer risk prediction based on other clinical features, like mammographic findings, is unknown. We conducted a retrospective case-control study, collecting mammographic findings and high-frequency/low-penetrance genetic variants from an existing personalized medicine data repository. A Bayesian network was developed using Tree Augmented Naive Bayes (TAN) by training on the mammographic findings, with and without the 22 genetic variants collected. We analyzed the predictive performance using the area under the ROC curve, and found that the genetic variants significantly improved breast cancer risk prediction on mammograms. We also identified the interaction effect between the genetic variants and collected mammographic findings in an attempt to link genotype to mammographic phenotype to better understand disease patterns, mechanisms, and/or natural history.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremMammographyBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk AssessmentROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID24551380
PMCPMC3900221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.