Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551379›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013

Priority queuing models for hospital intensive care units and impacts to severe case patients.

Matthew S Hagen, Jeffrey K Jopling, Timothy G Buchman, Eva K Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew S HagenCenter for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare ; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation ; College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA;
Jeffrey K JoplingEmory Center for Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Timothy G BuchmanEmory Center for Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Eva K LeeCenter for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare ; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation ; School of Industrial and Systems Engineering ; College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines several different queuing models for intensive care units (ICU) and the effects on wait times, utilization, return rates, mortalities, and number of patients served. Five separate intensive care units at an urban hospital are analyzed and distributions are fitted for arrivals and service durations. A system-based simulation model is built to capture all possible cases of patient flow after ICU admission. These include mortalities and returns before and after hospital exits. Patients are grouped into 9 different classes that are categorized by severity and length of stay (LOS). Each queuing model varies by the policies that are permitted and by the order the patients are admitted. The first set of models does not prioritize patients, but examines the advantages of smoothing the operating schedule for elective surgeries. The second set analyzes the differences between prioritizing admissions by expected LOS or patient severity. The last set permits early ICU discharges and conservative and aggressive bumping policies are contrasted. It was found that prioritizing patients by severity considerably reduced delays for critical cases, but also increased the average waiting time for all patients. Aggressive bumping significantly raised the return and mortality rates, but more conservative methods balance quality and efficiency with lowered wait times without serious consequences.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAppointments and SchedulesElectronic Health RecordsHospitalizationHospital MortalityHospitals, UrbanHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayNatural Language ProcessingSeverity of Illness IndexSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID24551379
PMCPMC3900220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.