ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013
Assessing the performance of LOINC® and RadLex for coverage of CT scans across three sites in a health information exchange.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lessons learned from implementing FAIRification workflows in diabetes research in Germany.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Semantic enrichment of Pomeranian health study data using LOINC and WHO-FIC terminology mapping principles.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Mapping of HIE CT terms to LOINC®: analysis of content-dependent coverage and coverage improvement through new term creation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Proposing New RadLex Terms by Analyzing Free-Text Mammography Reports.Journal of digital imaging · 2018Article
- Single-Center Experience Implementing the LOINC-RSNA Radiology Playbook for Adult Abdomen/Pelvis CT and MR Procedures Using a Semi-Automated Method.Journal of digital imaging · 2018Article
- Standard Anatomic Terminologies: Comparison for Use in a Health Information Exchange-Based Prior Computed Tomography (CT) Alerting System.JMIR medical informatics · 2017Article
- The potential adoption benefits and challenges of LOINC codes in a laboratory department: a case study.Health information science and systems · 2017Article
- Patient crossover and potentially avoidable repeat computed tomography exams across a health information exchange.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Knowledge Translation and Barriers to Imaging Optimization in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the performance of LOINC® and RadLex standard terminologies for covering CT test names from three sites in a health information exchange (HIE) with the eventual goal of building an HIE-based clinical decision support system to alert providers of prior duplicate CTs. Given the goal, the most important parameter to assess was coverage for high frequency exams that were most likely to be repeated. We showed that both LOINC® and RadLex provided sufficient coverage for our use case through calculations of (a) high coverage of 90% and 94%, respectively for the subset of CTs accounting for 99% of exams performed and (b) high concept token coverage (total percentage of exams performed that map to terminologies) of 92% and 95%, respectively. With trends toward greater interoperability, this work may provide a framework for those wishing to map radiology site codes to a standard nomenclature for purposes of tracking resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24551324PMC3900124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.