ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2013
Do health care users think electronic health records are important for themselves and their providers?: Exploring group differences in a national survey.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Do We Mean by Sharing of Patient Data? DaSH: A Data Sharing Hierarchy of Privacy and Ethical Challenges.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient access to electronic health records (EHR) is expected to have a variety of benefits, including enhanced patient involvement in care and access to health information, yet little is known about potential demand. We used the 2007 Health Information and National Trends Survey, a national probability-based survey, to determine which health care users with Internet access are likely to report that electronic access to their health records is important for themselves and their providers. Respondents who represent populations that generally experience health and healthcare disparities (Blacks, Latina/os, and patients with psychological distress) were among the most likely to report that the EHR was very important for them, even after controlling for respondents' socio-economic status, health status, health care context, and disposition toward health information. Health policies and the designs of EHRs should consider these patterns, which may help address health and health care disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24551321PMC3900121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.