Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

High-dose irradiation induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and developmental defects during Drosophila oogenesis.

Hee Jin Shim, Eun-Mi Lee, Long Duy Nguyen, Jaekyung Shim, Young-Han Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tumor-specific radiosensitizing effect of the ATM inhibitor AZD0156 in melanoma cells with low toxicity to healthy fibroblasts.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hee Jin ShimIlsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Eun-Mi LeeIlsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Long Duy NguyenIlsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Jaekyung ShimDepartment of Molecular Biology, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Han SongIlsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR) treatment induces a DNA damage response, including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis in metazoan somatic cells. Because little has been reported in germline cells, we performed a temporal analysis of the DNA damage response utilizing Drosophila oogenesis as a model system. Oogenesis in the adult Drosophila female begins with the generation of 16-cell cyst by four mitotic divisions of a cystoblast derived from the germline stem cells. We found that high-dose irradiation induced S and G2 arrests in these mitotically dividing germline cells in a grp/Chk1- and mnk/Chk2-dependent manner. However, the upstream kinase mei-41, Drosophila ATR ortholog, was required for the S-phase checkpoint but not for the G2 arrest. As in somatic cells, mnk/Chk2 and dp53 were required for the major cell death observed in early oogenesis when oocyte selection and meiotic recombination occurs. Similar to the unscheduled DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated from defective repair during meiotic recombination, IR-induced DSBs produced developmental defects affecting the spherical morphology of meiotic chromosomes and dorsal-ventral patterning. Moreover, various morphological abnormalities in the ovary were detected after irradiation. Most of the IR-induced defects observed in oogenesis were reversible and were restored between 24 and 96 h after irradiation. These defects in oogenesis severely reduced daily egg production and the hatch rate of the embryos of irradiated female. In summary, irradiated germline cells induced DSBs, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and developmental defects resulting in reduction of egg production and defective embryogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBody PatterningCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGene ExpressionMeiosisMitosisOogenesisRadiation, IonizingCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Drosophila Proteinsgrp protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID24551207
PMCPMC3923870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.