Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551142›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Distinct immune response in two MERS-CoV-infected patients: can we go from bench to bedside?

Emmanuel Faure, Julien Poissy, Anne Goffard, Clement Fournier, Eric Kipnis, Marie Titecat, Perinne Bortolotti, Laura Martinez, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Rodrigue Dessein and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structural proteins of human coronaviruses: what makes them different?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Rationale for Use of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in COVID-19 Patients: Overview of Scientific Evidence.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 in humans and animals.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel FaureHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Julien PoissyPôle de Réanimation, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Anne GoffardLaboratoire de Virologie, Centre de Biologie Pathologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Clement FournierClinique des Maladies Respiratoires, Endoscopie bronchique et pleurale - Endoscopie Interventionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Eric KipnisHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Marie TitecatInstitut de Microbiologie, Centre Biologie Pathologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Perinne BortolottiHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Laura MartinezHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Sylvain DubucquoiInstitut d'Immunologie, Centre Biologie Pathologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille Cedex, France.
Rodrigue DesseinHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Philippe GossetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8204, Lille, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1019, Lille, France.
Daniel MathieuPôle de Réanimation, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Benoit GueryHost-Pathogen translational research group, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.
Université de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHôpital Roger Salengro · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One year after the occurrence of the first case of infection by the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) there is no clear consensus on the best treatment to propose. The World Health Organization, as well as several other national agencies, are still working on different clinical approaches to implement the most relevant treatment in MERS-CoV infection. We compared innate and adaptive immune responses of two patients infected with MERS-CoV to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in the response and propose potential therapeutic approaches. Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) of the first week and sera of the first month from the two patients were used in this study. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) was performed after extraction of RNA from BAL cells of MERS-CoV infected patients and control patients. BAL supernatants and sera were used to assess cytokines and chemokines secretion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The first patient died rapidly after 3 weeks in the intensive care unit, the second patient still recovers from infection. The patient with a poor outcome (patient 1), compared to patient 2, did not promote type-1 Interferon (IFN), and particularly IFNα, in response to double stranded RNA (dsRNA) from MERS-CoV. The absence of IFNα, known to promote antigen presentation in response to viruses, impairs the development of a robust antiviral adaptive Th-1 immune response. This response is mediated by IL-12 and IFNγ that decreases viral clearance; levels of both of these mediators were decreased in patient 1. Finally, we confirm previous in vitro findings that MERS-CoV can drive IL-17 production in humans. Host recognition of viral dsRNA determines outcome in the early stage of MERS-CoV infection. We highlight the critical role of IFNα in this initial stage to orchestrate a robust immune response and bring substantial arguments for the indication of early IFNα treatment during MERS-CoV infection.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAdaptive ImmunityChemokine CXCL10CoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsFatal OutcomeHumansImmunity, InnateInterferon-alphaInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10Interleukin-12Interleukin-17MaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastChemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanInterferon-alphaInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10Interleukin-12Interleukin-17

Identifiers

PMID24551142
PMCPMC3925152
OpenAlexW1977050884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.