Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Transcriptome analysis of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata.

Sarit Karako-Lampert, Didier Zoccola, Mali Salmon-Divon, Mark Katzenellenbogen, Sylvie Tambutté, Anthony Bertucci, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Emeline Deleury, Denis Allemand, Oren Levy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sarit Karako-LampertThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Didier ZoccolaCentre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Mali Salmon-DivonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Mark KatzenellenbogenThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sylvie TambuttéCentre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Anthony BertucciCentre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco ; Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, UFR Sciences, Nice, France ; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Ove Hoegh-GuldbergGlobal Change Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Emeline DeleuryUniversité de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, UFR Sciences, Nice, France ; Institut Sophia Agrobiotech INRA 1355, CNRS 7254, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Denis AllemandCentre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Oren LevyThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Bar-Ilan University · ILScientific Centre of Monaco · MCAriel University · ILInstitut Sophia Agrobiotech · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The principal architects of coral reefs are the scleractinian corals; these species are divided in two major clades referred to as "robust" and "complex" corals. Although the molecular diversity of the "complex" clade has received considerable attention, with several expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries and a complete genome sequence having been constructed, the "robust" corals have received far less attention, despite the fact that robust corals have been prominent focal points for ecological and physiological studies. Filling this gap affords important opportunities to extend these studies and to improve our understanding of the differences between the two major clades. Here, we present an EST library from Stylophora pistillata (Esper 1797) and systematically analyze the assembled transcripts compared to putative homologs from the complete proteomes of six well-characterized metazoans: Nematostella vectensis, Hydra magnipapillata, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Ciona intestinalis and Homo sapiens. Furthermore, comparative analyses of the Stylophora pistillata ESTs were performed against several Cnidaria from the Scleractinia, Actiniaria and Hydrozoa, as well as against other stony corals separately. Functional characterization of S. pistillata transcripts into KOG/COG categories and further description of Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways showed that the assembled EST library provides sufficient data and coverage. These features of this new library suggest considerable opportunities for extending our understanding of the molecular and physiological behavior of "robust" corals.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsAnthozoaBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCoral ReefsExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryMolecular Sequence AnnotationTranscriptomeWnt ProteinsBone Morphogenetic ProteinsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24551124
PMCPMC3923803
OpenAlexW2015581136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.