Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551092›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Variation, evolution, and correlation analysis of C+G content and genome or chromosome size in different kingdoms and phyla.

Xiu-Qing Li, Donglei Du

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cultivation driven transcriptomic changes in the wild-type and mutant strains ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structure-Based GC Investigation Sheds New Light on ITS2 Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic and phenotypic comparison of polyhydroxyalkanoates producing strains of genusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Complete Genome Sequence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiu-Qing LiMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Potato Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Donglei DuQuantitative Methods Research Group, Faculty of Business Administration, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C+G content (GC content or G+C content) is known to be correlated with genome/chromosome size in bacteria but the relationship for other kingdoms remains unclear. This study analyzed genome size, chromosome size, and base composition in most of the available sequenced genomes in various kingdoms. Genome size tends to increase during evolution in plants and animals, and the same is likely true for bacteria. The genomic C+G contents were found to vary greatly in microorganisms but were quite similar within each animal or plant subkingdom. In animals and plants, the C+G contents are ranked as follows: monocot plants>mammals>non-mammalian animals>dicot plants. The variation in C+G content between chromosomes within species is greater in animals than in plants. The correlation between average chromosome C+G content and chromosome length was found to be positive in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria (but not in other analyzed bacterial phyla), Ascomycota fungi, and likely also in some plants; negative in some animals, insignificant in two protist phyla, and likely very weak in Archaea. Clearly, correlations between C+G content and chromosome size can be positive, negative, or not significant depending on the kingdoms/groups or species. Different phyla or species exhibit different patterns of correlation between chromosome-size and C+G content. Most chromosomes within a species have a similar pattern of variation in C+G content but outliers are common. The data presented in this study suggest that the C+G content is under genetic control by both trans- and cis- factors and that the correlation between C+G content and chromosome length can be positive, negative, or not significant in different phyla.

Indexed as

Base CompositionBiological EvolutionChromosomesGenome SizeAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaPhylogenyPlantsStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID24551092
PMCPMC3923770
OpenAlexW1990400309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.