Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Redundancy-aware topic modeling for patient record notes.

Raphael Cohen, Iddo Aviram, Michael Elhadad, Noémie Elhadad

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using Clinical Notes and Natural Language Processing for Automated HIV Risk Assessment.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018
    Article
  15. What's in a Note? Unpacking Predictive Value in Clinical Note Representations.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Automated methods for the summarization of electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raphael CohenDepartment of Computer Science, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Iddo AviramDepartment of Computer Science, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Michael ElhadadDepartment of Computer Science, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Noémie ElhadadDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

An NLP Approach to Generating Patient Record SummariesR01LM010027 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2009 to 2010
$912k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical notes in a given patient record contain much redundancy, in large part due to clinicians' documentation habit of copying from previous notes in the record and pasting into a new note. Previous work has shown that this redundancy has a negative impact on the quality of text mining and topic modeling in particular. In this paper we describe a novel variant of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, Red-LDA, which takes into account the inherent redundancy of patient records when modeling content of clinical notes. To assess the value of Red-LDA, we experiment with three baselines and our novel redundancy-aware topic modeling method: given a large collection of patient records, (i) apply vanilla LDA to all documents in all input records; (ii) identify and remove all redundancy by chosing a single representative document for each record as input to LDA; (iii) identify and remove all redundant paragraphs in each record, leaving partial, non-redundant documents as input to LDA; and (iv) apply Red-LDA to all documents in all input records. Both quantitative evaluation carried out through log-likelihood on held-out data and topic coherence of produced topics and qualitative assessment of topics carried out by physicians show that Red-LDA produces superior models to all three baseline strategies. This research contributes to the emerging field of understanding the characteristics of the electronic health record and how to account for them in the framework of data mining. The code for the two redundancy-elimination baselines and Red-LDA is made publicly available to the community.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Records, PersonalModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsData MiningDocumentationHumans

Identifiers

PMID24551060
PMCPMC3923754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.