Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24551045›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Molecular evidence of RNA editing in Bombyx chemosensory protein family.

Ning Xuan, Xun Bu, Yan Yan Liu, Xue Yang, Guo Xia Liu, Zhong Xue Fan, Yu Ping Bi, Lian Qun Yang, Qi Nian Lou, Balaji Rajashekar and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Lactobacillus for ribosome peptide editing cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ning XuanBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Xun BuBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Yan Yan LiuBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Xue YangBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Guo Xia LiuBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Zhong Xue FanBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Yu Ping BiBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Lian Qun YangBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Qi Nian LouShandong Silkworm Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
Balaji RajashekarInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartumaa Province, Estonia.
Getter LeppikProteomics Core Facility, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartumaa Province, Estonia.
Sergo KasvandikProteomics Core Facility, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartumaa Province, Estonia.
Jean-François PicimbonBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are small scavenger proteins that are mainly known as transporters of pheromone/odor molecules at the periphery of sensory neurons in the insect antennae and in the producing cells from the moth female pheromone gland. Sequencing cDNAs of RNA encoding CSPs in the antennae, legs, head, pheromone gland and wings from five single individual adult females of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori showed that they differed from genomic sequences by subtle nucleotide replacement (RDD). Both intronless and intronic CSP genes expressed RDDs, although in different rates. Most interestingly, in our study the degree of RDDs in CSP genes were found to be tissue-specific. The proportion of CSP-RDDs was found to be significantly much higher in the pheromone gland. In addition, Western blot analysis of proteins in different tissues showed existence of multiple CSP protein variant chains particularly found in the pheromone gland. Peptide sequencing demonstrated the occurrence of a pleiad of protein variants for most of all BmorCSPs from the pheromone gland. Our findings show that RNA editing is an important feature in the expression of CSPs and that a high variety of RDDs is found to expand drastically thus altering the repertoire of CSP proteins in a tissue-specific manner.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectRNA EditingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBase SequenceBombyxDNA, ComplementaryFemaleInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataOrgan SpecificityPheromonesPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, OdorantScent GlandsDNA, ComplementaryInsect ProteinsPheromonesReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID24551045
PMCPMC3923736
OpenAlexW2030730499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.