Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550908›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

Theories and quantification of thymic selection.

Andrew J Yates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stabilization of β-Catenin Directs HEB to Limit Thymic Selection.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A journey to your self: The vague definition of immune self and its practical implications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling T Cell Fate.Annual review of immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Inferring the T cell repertoire dynamics of healthy individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew J YatesDepartments of Systems and Computational Biology, Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , New York, NY , USA.

Funding

Modeling the development, structure and regulation of T cell memoryR01AI093870 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW · PI YATES, ANDREW · 2011 to 2025
$5.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peripheral T cell repertoire is sculpted from prototypic T cells in the thymus bearing randomly generated T cell receptors (TCR) and by a series of developmental and selection steps that remove cells that are unresponsive or overly reactive to self-peptide-MHC complexes. The challenge of understanding how the kinetics of T cell development and the statistics of the selection processes combine to provide a diverse but self-tolerant T cell repertoire has invited quantitative modeling approaches, which are reviewed here.

Indexed as

mathematical modelingrepertoire selectionT cellstheoretical biologythymic selection

Identifiers

PMID24550908
PMCPMC3912788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.