ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioural energetics in human locomotion: how energy use influences how we move.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Distinctive properties of biological neural networks and recent advances in bottom-up approaches toward a better biologically plausible neural network.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Review
- Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Neural Correlates of Multisensory Integration for Feedback Stabilization of the Wrist.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
- Effect of Short-Term Exposure to Supplemental Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback on Goal-Directed Movements after Stroke: A Proof of Concept Case Series.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching.eLife · 2020Article
- Temporal Asynchrony but Not Total Energy Nor Duration Improves the Judgment of Numerosity in Electrotactile Stimulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2017Article
- Elasticity improves handgrip performance and user experience during visuomotor control.Royal Society open science · 2017Article
- Dynamic Multisensory Integration: Somatosensory Speed Trumps Visual Accuracy during Feedback Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- A New Neurocognitive Interpretation of Shoulder Position Sense during Reaching: Unexpected Competence in the Measurement of Extracorporeal Space.BioMed research international · 2016Observational
- Multisensory integration in action control.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many actions involve limb movements toward a target. Visual and proprioceptive estimates are available online, and by optimally combining (Ernst and Banks, 2002) both modalities during the movement, the system can increase the precision of the hand estimate. The notion that both sensory modalities are integrated is also motivated by the intuition that we do not consciously perceive any discrepancy between the felt and seen hand's positions. This coherence as a result of integration does not necessarily imply realignment between the two modalities (Smeets et al., 2006). For example, the two estimates (visual and proprioceptive) might be different without either of them (e.g., proprioception) ever being adjusted after recovering the other (e.g., vision). The implication that the felt and seen positions might be different has a temporal analog. Because the actual feedback from the hand at a given instantaneous position reaches brain areas at different times for proprioception and vision (shorter for proprioception), the corresponding instantaneous unisensory position estimates will be different, with the proprioceptive one being ahead of the visual one. Based on the assumption that the system integrates optimally and online the available evidence from both senses, we introduce a temporal mechanism that explains the reported overestimation of hand positions when vision is occluded for active and passive movements (Gritsenko et al., 2007) without the need to resort to initial feedforward estimates (Wolpert et al., 1995). We set up hypotheses to test the validity of the model, and we contrast simulation-based predictions with empirical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.