Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550748›Full record

ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2013

Genomic profiling in triple-negative breast cancer.

Cornelia Liedtke, Christof Bernemann, Ludwig Kiesel, Achim Rody

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel prognostic two-gene signature for triple negative breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Cancer Neoantigens Can Induce CD8Cancer immunology research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelia LiedtkeKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Christof BernemannKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany.
Ludwig KieselKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany.
Achim RodyKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Klinik für Frauenheilkunde · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by a lack of hormone receptor expression as well as lack of overexpression/amplification of HER2/neu. Patients with TNBC show a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients with other breast cancer subtypes. TNBC, however, is a heterogeneous entity both with regard to clinical/pathological characteristics and molecular biology. This review summarizes the current data on TNBC with a particular focus on mutational and gene expression profiling and the association between TNBC and breast cancer stem cells.

Indexed as

HeterogeneityRNA profilingTriple negative breast cancer, subtypesWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID24550748
PMCPMC3919434
OpenAlexW1985459298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.