ArticlePLoS genetics2014
Accurate and robust genomic prediction of celiac disease using statistical learning.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Genomic prediction of coronary heart disease.European heart journal · 2016Pooled it
- Common polygenic variation in coeliac disease and confirmation of ZNF335 and NIFA as disease susceptibility loci.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Pooled it
- The clinical utility of exome sequencing for risk stratification in celiac disease.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Linkage between HLA-B8 and HLA-DQ2.5 contributes to ancestry-dependent risk for celiac disease.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Methodologies underpinning polygenic risk scores estimation: a comprehensive overview.Human genetics · 2024Review
- Evaluation of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes in patients with endometriosis, A case-control study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- The immunogenetics of tuberculosis (TB) susceptibility.Immunogenetics · 2023Review
- Polygenic Health Index, General Health, and Pleiotropy: Sibling Analysis and Disease Risk Reduction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review article: Follow-up of coeliac disease.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Machine learning optimized polygenic scores for blood cell traits identify sex-specific trajectories and genetic correlations with disease.Cell genomics · 2022Article
- Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Construction and Application of Polygenic Risk Scores in Autoimmune Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Random forests algorithm boosts genetic risk prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Statistical models and computational tools for predicting complex traits and diseases.Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps.Nature medicine · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from SNPs and of Disease Risk from Biomarkers in the UK Biobank.Genes · 2021Article
- Independent and cumulative coeliac disease-susceptibility loci are associated with distinct disease phenotypes.Journal of human genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Practical application of genomic-based risk stratification to clinical diagnosis is appealing yet performance varies widely depending on the disease and genomic risk score (GRS) method. Celiac disease (CD), a common immune-mediated illness, is strongly genetically determined and requires specific HLA haplotypes. HLA testing can exclude diagnosis but has low specificity, providing little information suitable for clinical risk stratification. Using six European cohorts, we provide a proof-of-concept that statistical learning approaches which simultaneously model all SNPs can generate robust and highly accurate predictive models of CD based on genome-wide SNP profiles. The high predictive capacity replicated both in cross-validation within each cohort (AUC of 0.87-0.89) and in independent replication across cohorts (AUC of 0.86-0.9), despite differences in ethnicity. The models explained 30-35% of disease variance and up to ∼43% of heritability. The GRS's utility was assessed in different clinically relevant settings. Comparable to HLA typing, the GRS can be used to identify individuals without CD with ≥99.6% negative predictive value however, unlike HLA typing, fine-scale stratification of individuals into categories of higher-risk for CD can identify those that would benefit from more invasive and costly definitive testing. The GRS is flexible and its performance can be adapted to the clinical situation by adjusting the threshold cut-off. Despite explaining a minority of disease heritability, our findings indicate a genomic risk score provides clinically relevant information to improve upon current diagnostic pathways for CD and support further studies evaluating the clinical utility of this approach in CD and other complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.