Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550667›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Efficacy and safety of brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination compared with timolol in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Keiji Yoshikawa, Jun Kozaki, Hidetaka Maeda

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keiji YoshikawaYoshikawa Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun KozakiKozaki Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetaka MaedaMaeda Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed-combination (BRINZ/TIM-FC) therapy compared with timolol 0.5% (TIM) monotherapy in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

methodsThis randomized, double-masked, multicenter study included Japanese patients aged ≥20 years. Patients were treated during a 4-week observation period with TIM monotherapy in advance of randomization to treatment with topical BRINZ/TIM-FC or TIM monotherapy twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to week 8 at 2 hours postinstillation. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at each visit.

resultsA total of 301 patients (BRINZ/TIM-FC, n=150; TIM, n=151; age [mean ± standard deviation], 61±13 years) were enrolled. Mean IOP reductions from baseline were greater with BRINZ/TIM-FC than with TIM at weeks 4 and 8 at 0 and 2 hours postinstillation (all P≤0.0001), with mean reductions of -3.2 mmHg with BRINZ/TIM-FC and -1.4 mmHg with TIM at week 8, 2 hours postinstillation. Although AEs were observed in 19% of all patients (BRINZ/TIM-FC, 20%; TIM, 19%), all AEs were mild or moderate.

conclusionBRINZ/TIM-FC therapy was associated with significantly greater reductions in IOP compared with TIM, and it was well tolerated in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Indexed as

Azargabeta blockercarbonic anhydrase inhibitorintraocular pressure

Identifiers

PMID24550667
PMCPMC3926459
OpenAlexW2014561379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.