Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550660›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2014

Patient preference and satisfaction with their involvement in the selection of an anesthetic method for surgery.

Sung Mi Hwang, Jae Jun Lee, Ji Su Jang, Gi Ho Gim, Min Chul Kim, So Young Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Learning as we grow, growing as we learn.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sung Mi HwangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3141-544X
Jae Jun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-500X
Ji Su JangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9534-919X
Gi Ho GimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-9667
Min Chul KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-2179
So Young LimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-4574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction of patients who participated in the decision-making process for selecting an anesthesia method for surgery; the patients' preferred role (active, collaborative or passive) in the decision-making; and the patients' preferred choice of anesthetic method. The study included 257 patients scheduled for simple elective surgeries involving the upper or lower extremities. During the preanesthetic visit, patients were informed regarding two methods of anesthesia for their surgeries, and participated in selecting one option. Of the 257 patients, 69.6% preferred a collaborative role, 18.3% and 12.1% preferred an active and a passive role, respectively. Among patients requiring surgery on an upper extremity and on a lower extremity, 64.3% and 51.3% expressed a preference for general anesthesia over regional anesthesia, respectively. After surgery, the majority of our patients were satisfied (93.4%) and felt respected (97.7%). Furthermore, the patients expressed a change in preference for assuming an active role (49.4%) and a collaborative role (43.6%) in the decision-making process for their future anesthesia needs. This study may help to promote patient centered care in a department of anesthesiology.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionAdultAgedDecision MakingExtremitiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CarePhysician-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesAnesthesiaDecision MakingPatient-Centered CarePatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID24550660
PMCPMC3924012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.