Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550272›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Reciprocal interactions of human C10orf12 and C17orf96 with PRC2 revealed by BioTAP-XL cross-linking and affinity purification.

Artyom A Alekseyenko, Andrey A Gorchakov, Peter V Kharchenko, Mitzi I Kuroda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CRISPR/Cas13 sgRNA-Mediated RNA-RNA Interaction Mapping in Live Cells with APOBEC RNA Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Variant Polycomb complexes inScience advances · 2022
    Article
  15. Critical Roles of Polycomb Repressive Complexes in Transcription and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Epigenomes · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Artyom A AlekseyenkoDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Andrey A Gorchakov
Peter V Kharchenko
Mitzi I Kuroda
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RU

Funding

Comprehensive analysis of epigenetic regulators in their native chromatin contextR01GM101958 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KURODA, MITZI I · 2012 to 2018
$2.4M
Age-associated chromatin changes in hematopoiesisK25AG037596 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KHARCHENKO, PETER V · 2010 to 2014
$749k
NIA NIH HHS K25 AG037596NIA NIH HHS K25AG037596NIGMS NIH HHS GM101958NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the composition of epigenetic regulators remains an important challenge in chromatin biology. Traditional biochemical analysis of chromatin-associated complexes requires their release from DNA under conditions that can also disrupt key interactions. Here we develop a complementary approach (BioTAP-XL), in which cross-linking (XL) enhances the preservation of protein interactions and also allows the analysis of DNA targets under the same tandem affinity purification (BioTAP) regimen. We demonstrate the power of BioTAP-XL through analysis of human EZH2, a core subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2). We identify and validate two strong interactors, C10orf12 and C17orf96, which display enrichment with EZH2-BioTAP at levels similar to canonical PRC2 components (SUZ12, EED, MTF2, JARID2, PHF1, and AEBP2). ChIP-seq analysis of BioTAP-tagged C10orf12 or C17orf96 revealed the similarity of each binding pattern with the location of EZH2 and the H3K27me3-silencing mark, validating their physical interaction with PRC2 components. Interestingly, analysis by mass spectrometry of C10orf12 and C17orf96 interactions revealed that these proteins may be mutually exclusive PRC2 subunits that fail to interact with each other or with JARID2 and AEBP2. C10orf12, in addition, shows a strong and unexpected association with components of the EHMT1/2 complex, thus potentially connecting PRC2 to another histone methyltransferase. Similarly, results from CBX4-BioTAP protein pulldowns are consistent with reports of a diversity of PRC1 complexes. Our results highlight the importance of reciprocal analyses of multiple subunits and suggest that iterative use of BioTAP-XL has strong potential to reveal networks of chromatin-based interactions in higher organisms.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatography, LiquidChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCross-Linking ReagentsDNA-Binding ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinFormaldehydeHEK293 CellsHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 2ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNAChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCross-Linking ReagentsDNA-Binding ProteinsEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEPOP protein, humanEZH2 protein, humanFormaldehydeLCOR protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 2ProteinsRepressor Proteinschromatin IPformaldehyde cross-linkingLC-MS/MSprotein–protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID24550272
PMCPMC3932854
OpenAlexW2088411007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.