Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550254›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Auditory synapses to song premotor neurons are gated off during vocalization in zebra finches.

Kosuke Hamaguchi, Katherine A Tschida, Inho Yoon, Bruce R Donald, Richard Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The neurobiology of innate, volitional and learned vocalizations in mammals and birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Corticobasal ganglia projecting neurons are required for juvenile vocal learning but not for adult vocal plasticity in songbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kosuke HamaguchiDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Katherine A Tschida
Inho Yoon
Bruce R Donald
Richard Mooney

Funding

Basic Predoctoral Training in NeuroscienceT32GM008441 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 1992 to 2017
$4.4M
Computational Structure-Based Protein DesignR01GM078031 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONALD, BRUCE R. · 2008 to 2021
$4.3M
SYNAPTIC AND CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AVIAN SONG LEARNINGR01DC002524 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 1995 to 2014
$4.1M
Miniature Microdrive for Intracellular Recordings in Freely Behaving MiceR21NS079929 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2013
$376k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002524NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC02524NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078031NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM78031NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS079929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds use auditory feedback to learn and maintain their songs, but how feedback interacts with vocal motor circuitry remains unclear. A potential site for this interaction is the song premotor nucleus HVC, which receives auditory input and contains neurons (HVCX cells) that innervate an anterior forebrain pathway (AFP) important to feedback-dependent vocal plasticity. Although the singing-related output of HVCX cells is unaltered by distorted auditory feedback (DAF), deafening gradually weakens synapses on HVCX cells, raising the possibility that they integrate feedback only at subthreshold levels during singing. Using intracellular recordings in singing zebra finches, we found that DAF failed to perturb singing-related synaptic activity of HVCX cells, although many of these cells responded to auditory stimuli in non-singing states. Moreover, in vivo multiphoton imaging revealed that deafening-induced changes to HVCX synapses require intact AFP output. These findings support a model in which the AFP accesses feedback independent of HVC. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01833.001.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionNeuronal PlasticitySynaptic TransmissionVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory ThresholdBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFeedback, PhysiologicalFinchesMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor CortexSound Spectrographyauditory feedbackbirdsongsensorimotorzebra finch

Identifiers

PMID24550254
PMCPMC3927426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.