Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550217›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2014

Use of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score (DPTRS) for improving the accuracy of the risk classification of type 1 diabetes.

Jay M Sosenko, Jay S Skyler, Jeffrey Mahon, Jeffrey P Krischer, Carla J Greenbaum, Lisa E Rafkin, Craig A Beam, David C Boulware, Della Matheson, David Cuthbertson and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05219409 phase2 / phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Sitagliptin in Relatives of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, at High Risk of Developing the Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2023 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsSitagliptin, Professional CGM
NCT06815081 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Study to Determine a Capillary Alternative to the Gold Standard Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2024 to 2027Enrolled135ConditionsType 1 Diabetes (T1D), Type 2 Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time to reframe the disease staging system for type 1 diabetes.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  16. Beyond Stages: Predicting Individual Time Dependent Risk for Type 1 Diabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jay M SosenkoCorresponding author: Jay M. Sosenko, jsosenko@med.miami.edu.
Jay S Skyler
Jeffrey Mahon
Jeffrey P Krischer
Carla J Greenbaum
Lisa E Rafkin
Craig A Beam
David C Boulware
Della Matheson
David Cuthbertson
Kevan C Herold
George Eisenbarth
Jerry P Palmer
Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet and Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Study Groups

Funding

Data Coordinating Center for Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet (UC4)USF: TrialNet UC4-3UC4DK117009 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2017 to 2019
$49.6M
NIDDK Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Data Coordinating CenterUC4DK097835 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2012 to 2012
$45.0M
Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Richard A Flavell · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
Type I Diabetes Trialnet at StsnfordU01DK061042 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, DARRELL M · 2001 to 2018
$8.5M
UCSF Trialnet: A Phase II Trial of Imatimib in New Onset Type I DiabetesU01DK061010 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GITELMAN, STEPHEN E · 2001 to 2018
$8.1M
Type 1 Diabetes-A Proposal for Prevention & InterventionU01DK085476 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MORAN, ANTOINETTE M. · 2009 to 2018
$7.1M
Prediction and Prevention of Type I DiabetesU01DK061058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BECKER, DOROTHY J · 2001 to 2018
$6.5M
TrialNet: University of Florida Clinical Center and NetworkU01DK085461 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HALLER, MICHAEL JAMES · 2009 to 2018
$5.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061010NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061042NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061058NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085461NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085476NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK097835NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK117009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We studied the utility of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score (DPTRS) for improving the accuracy of type 1 diabetes (T1D) risk classification in TrialNet Natural History Study (TNNHS) participants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The cumulative incidence of T1D was compared between normoglycemic individuals with DPTRS values >7.00 and dysglycemic individuals in the TNNHS (n = 991). It was also compared between individuals with DPTRS values <7.00 or >7.00 among those with dysglycemia and those with multiple autoantibodies in the TNNHS. DPTRS values >7.00 were compared with dysglycemia for characterizing risk in Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) (n = 670) and TNNHS participants. The reliability of DPTRS values >7.00 was compared with dysglycemia in the TNNHS. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of T1D for normoglycemic TNNHS participants with DPTRS values >7.00 was comparable to those with dysglycemia. Among those with dysglycemia, the cumulative incidence was much higher (P < 0.001) for those with DPTRS values >7.00 than for those with values <7.00 (3-year risks: 0.16 for <7.00 and 0.46 for >7.00). Dysglycemic individuals in DPT-1 were at much higher risk for T1D than those with dysglycemia in the TNNHS (P < 0.001); there was no significant difference in risk between the studies among those with DPTRS values >7.00. The proportion in the TNNHS reverting from dysglycemia to normoglycemia at the next visit was higher than the proportion reverting from DPTRS values >7.00 to values <7.00 (36 vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS DPTRS thresholds can improve T1D risk classification accuracy by identifying high-risk normoglycemic and low-risk dysglycemic individuals. The 7.00 DPTRS threshold characterizes risk more consistently between populations and has greater reliability than dysglycemia.

Indexed as

AdultAutoantibodiesBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsAutoantibodiesBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID24550217
PMCPMC3964487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.