Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550152›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2014

Human hippocampal processing of environmental novelty during spatial navigation.

Raphael Kaplan, Aidan J Horner, Peter A Bandettini, Christian F Doeller, Neil Burgess

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Prior novelty invigorates future mesolimbic target detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Toward brain-trained humanoid robots.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Raphael KaplanNIMH-UCL Joint Graduate Partnership Program in Neuroscience, Bethesda, Maryland; UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom; Section on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Aidan J Horner
Peter A Bandettini
Christian F Doeller
Neil Burgess
University College London · GBInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod · FRNational Institute of Mental Health · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZIAMH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Medical Research Council G0300117Medical Research Council G1000854Medical Research Council G1002276Wellcome Trust 095811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and processing of novel information encountered as we explore our environment is crucial for learning and adaptive behavior. The human hippocampus has been strongly implicated in laboratory tests of novelty detection and episodic memory, but has been less well studied during more ethological tasks such as spatial navigation, typically used in animals. We examined fMRI BOLD activity as a function of environmental and object novelty as humans performed an object-location virtual navigation task. We found greater BOLD response to novel relative to familiar environments in the hippocampus and adjacent parahippocampal gyrus. Object novelty was associated with increased activity in the posterior parahippocampal/fusiform gyrus and anterior hippocampus extending into the amygdala and superior temporal sulcus. Importantly, whilst mid-posterior hippocampus was more sensitive to environmental novelty than object novelty, the anterior hippocampus responded similarly to both forms of novelty. Amygdala activity showed an increase for novel objects that decreased linearly over the learning phase. By investigating how participants learn and use different forms of information during spatial navigation, we found that medial temporal lobe (MTL) activity reflects both the novelty of the environment and of the objects located within it. This novelty processing is likely supported by distinct, but partially overlapping, sets of regions within the MTL.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingExploratory BehaviorHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParahippocampal GyrusRecognition, PsychologySpatial NavigationTemporal LobeYoung AdultamygdalacontentcontextfMRIMTL

Identifiers

PMID24550152
PMCPMC4255751
OpenAlexW2106428735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.