Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24550111›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

Earmuff restricts progenitor cell potential by attenuating the competence to respond to self-renewal factors.

Derek H Janssens, Hideyuki Komori, Daniel Grbac, Keng Chen, Chwee Tat Koe, Hongyan Wang, Cheng-Yu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Indirect neurogenesis in space and time.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derek H JanssensProgram in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Hideyuki Komori
Daniel Grbac
Keng Chen
Chwee Tat Koe
Hongyan Wang
Cheng-Yu Lee

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AT MICHIGANT32GM007315 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PUTHENVEEDU, MANOJKUMAR A · 1985 to 2021
$12.8M
Earmuff maintains restricted potentials of mature secondary neuroblastsR01GM092818 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEE, CHENG-YU · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092818NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM092818NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007315NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite expressing stem cell self-renewal factors, intermediate progenitor cells possess restricted developmental potential, which allows them to give rise exclusively to differentiated progeny rather than stem cell progeny. Failure to restrict the developmental potential can allow intermediate progenitor cells to revert into aberrant stem cells that might contribute to tumorigenesis. Insight into stable restriction of the developmental potential in intermediate progenitor cells could improve our understanding of the development and growth of tumors, but the mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. Intermediate neural progenitors (INPs), generated by type II neural stem cells (neuroblasts) in fly larval brains, provide an in vivo model for investigating the mechanisms that stably restrict the developmental potential of intermediate progenitor cells. Here, we report that the transcriptional repressor protein Earmuff (Erm) functions temporally after Brain tumor (Brat) and Numb to restrict the developmental potential of uncommitted (immature) INPs. Consistently, endogenous Erm is detected in immature INPs but undetectable in INPs. Erm-dependent restriction of the developmental potential in immature INPs leads to attenuated competence to respond to all known neuroblast self-renewal factors in INPs. We also identified that the BAP chromatin-remodeling complex probably functions cooperatively with Erm to restrict the developmental potential of immature INPs. Together, these data led us to conclude that the Erm-BAP-dependent mechanism stably restricts the developmental potential of immature INPs by attenuating their genomic responses to stem cell self-renewal factors. We propose that restriction of developmental potential by the Erm-BAP-dependent mechanism functionally distinguishes intermediate progenitor cells from stem cells, ensuring the generation of differentiated cells and preventing the formation of progenitor cell-derived tumor-initiating stem cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalStem CellsTranscription Factorsbrat protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinserm protein, DrosophilaKlu protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsBrmDevelopmental potentialEarmuffIntermediate neural progenitorNeuroblastSelf-renewal factors

Identifiers

PMID24550111
PMCPMC3929404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.