Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24549822›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2014

Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays can be effectively inserted in skin by self-application: a pilot study centred on pharmacist intervention and a patient information leaflet.

Ryan F Donnelly, Kurtis Moffatt, Ahlam Zaid Alkilani, Eva M Vicente-Pérez, Johanne Barry, Maelíosa T C McCrudden, A David Woolfson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Smart micro/nanoneedles for gene delivery.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Swellable Microneedles in Drug Delivery and Diagnostics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Recent advancements in single dose slow-release devices for prophylactic vaccines.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Transdermal approaches to vaccinations in the COVID-19 pandemic era.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan F DonnellySchool of Pharmacy, Queens University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK, r.donnelly@qub.ac.uk.
Kurtis Moffatt
Ahlam Zaid Alkilani
Eva M Vicente-Pérez
Johanne Barry
Maelíosa T C McCrudden
A David Woolfson

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K020234/1Wellcome Trust WT094085MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate, for the first time, the influence of pharmacist intervention and the use of a patient information leaflet on self-application of hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays by human volunteers without the aid of an applicator device.

methodsA patient information leaflet was drafted and pharmacist counselling strategy devised. Twenty human volunteers applied 11 × 11 arrays of 400 μm hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays to their own skin following the instructions provided. Skin barrier function disruption was assessed using transepidermal water loss measurements and optical coherence tomography and results compared to those obtained when more experienced researchers applied the microneedles to the volunteers or themselves.

resultsVolunteer self-application of the 400 μm microneedle design resulted in an approximately 30% increase in skin transepidermal water loss, which was not significantly different from that seen with self-application by the more experienced researchers or application to the volunteers. Use of optical coherence tomography showed that self-application of microneedles of the same density (400 μm, 600 μm and 900 μm) led to percentage penetration depths of approximately 75%, 70% and 60%, respectively, though the diameter of the micropores created remained quite constant at approximately 200 μm. Transepidermal water loss progressively increased with increasing height of the applied microneedles and this data, like that for penetration depth, was consistent, regardless of applicant.

conclusionWe have shown that hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays can be successfully and reproducibly applied by human volunteers given appropriate instruction. If these outcomes were able to be extrapolated to the general patient population, then use of bespoke MN applicator devices may not be necessary, thus possibly enhancing patient compliance.

Indexed as

PharmacistsProfessional RoleAdministration, CutaneousFemaleHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMaleMicroinjectionsPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsSelf AdministrationSkinTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.