ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2014
[Transplants from the hard palate: method for mucosal graft reconstruction of the upper eyelid].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Results of Cutler-Beard procedure for reconstruction of extensive full thickness upper eyelid defects following tumor resection].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016Trial
- Review
- Extensive full-thickness eyelid reconstruction with rotation flaps through "subcutaneous tunnel" and palatal mucosal grafts.International journal of ophthalmology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucosal grafts from the hard palate for reconstruction of the posterior lamella of the upper eyelid were compared for three different indications. The plastic reconstruction of the upper eyelid was carried out in patients with symblepharon and upper eyelid entropion following an autoimmune disease, in patients with subtotal or total upper eyelid resection due to a neoplasm and in patients with mucous membrane trauma using autogenous mucosal grafts from the hard palate. PATIENTS: In this retrospective comparative interventional case series 23 eyes from 19 patients were included in whom upper eyelid reconstruction was undertaken at the University Eye Hospital in Salzburg between 2001 and 2012. Reconstruction with hard palate grafts was performed in 5 eyes following extensive tumor resection, in 5 eyes of 3 patients after autoimmune diseases and in 13 eyes of 11 patients following trauma rehabilitation.
resultsIn the total collective of patients who underwent upper eyelid reconstruction with hard palate grafts, no graft rejection or loss of graft occurred. Hard palate grafts are useful for reconstruction after tumor surgery in addition to other techniques in order to achieve good functional and esthetic results. For patients suffering from autoimmune disease (e.g. ocular pemphigus and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) the use of hard palate grafts was found to be equally useful, although results can possibly deteriorate over time due to the underlying disease. Hard palate grafts were shown to be very useful in reconstruction of the upper eyelid for correction of entropium due to symblepharon and distichiasis following thermal and chemical burns.
conclusionHard palate grafts are suitable as mucosal grafts replacing conjunctiva in systemic disease and are equally effective in the treatment of traumatic upper eyelid defects - such as defects after tumor surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.