ArticleHNO2014
[Which colours can we hear?: light stimulation of the hearing system].
Article in HNO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First biocompatibility margins for optical stimulation at the eardrum via 532-nm laser pulses in a mouse model.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Frequency-specific activation of the peripheral auditory system using optoacoustic laser stimulation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Optoacoustic effect is responsible for laser-induced cochlear responses.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of conventional hearing aids and electrical auditory prostheses for hearing impaired patients is still limited in noisy environments and for sounds more complex than speech (e. g. music). This is partially due to the difficulty of frequency-specific activation of the auditory system using these devices. Stimulation of the auditory system using light pulses represents an alternative to mechanical and electrical stimulation. Light is a source of energy that can be very exactly focused and applied with little scattering, thus offering perspectives for optimal activation of the auditory system. Studies investigating light stimulation of sectors along the auditory pathway have shown stimulation of the auditory system is possible using light pulses. However, further studies and developments are needed before a new generation of light stimulation-based auditory prostheses can be made available for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24549506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.