Letter to the Editor regarding: epistatic effects in pathophysiology of asthma and the "missing heritability" of this disease.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Have recent investigations into remission from childhood asthma helped in understanding the pathogenesis of this disease?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Epistatic effects of multiple receptor genes on pathophysiology of asthma - its limits and potential for clinical application.2014

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as